Just a reminder. There was a poster named NEEDAQB way back when Joe Hamilton was just starting.
for 11 years all they did was stare at a primary receiver, never had to presnap read defenses the way we do now, our prior presnap reads focused on the option calls primarily, or the route combos we do now. Its like, one spring practice, one fall, and some of us expect peyton manning. I expect the QB to stare down all year. All they did in the old offense was throw 9 routes and comebacks. There was no crossing routes, pick plays, minimal to no screen game, no RPO; we did have smash concepts only for the deep ball or comeback. Thats about it.
We essentially have 3 true freshman QBs. How many true freshman qb's stare down their target? Like, all of them.
Its going to take time. It won't be fixed this year....Its on reason I think you just let graham roll with it all year; and use TO in packages
So here is a question for folks....especially for former players and or Coaches.... Is it to late for GT to go with a run heavy offense this year say like Wyoming or has the offense scheme installed thus far not compatible with going Run Heavy???
For Example the scheme called Zone Wham. (Like Zone Read) The play features a split flow action in the backfield with the H back moving against the grain of the play to kick out the EMOL.
Why the Zone Wham ?? It blocks the EMOL, so there is no need for a QB read. That keeps the read viable and accounts for the backside linebacker in a gap-exchange. It was something like a signature play for the 49ers during the Colin Kaepernick era. (SO it can be a Developmental Offense)
The Zone Wham can be executed out of an unbalanced formations— the tight end is covered by a wide receiver— with a Jet Sweep fake as window dressing and onand on...
Not only was there another wide open receiver, there was nothing but empty space for him to run for at least 15 yards. But he zeroes in on the primary receiver and ignores all the other options.If the QBs don’t stop staring down the primary receiver we aren’t going anywhere. On the long pass late in the game, Johnson didn’t even look anywhere else. The corner who broke up the pass left his man on the outside to play the focus inside receiver. The target receiver had beaten his man deep off the line of scrimmage. The wide open people were sometimes wide open because of this - and there are two or three defenders when the ball arrives. You usually won’t see this on TV - only when you are at the game and can see the whole 22.
If the QBs don’t stop staring down the primary receiver we aren’t going anywhere. On the long pass late in the game, Johnson didn’t even look anywhere else. The corner who broke up the pass left his man on the outside to play the focus inside receiver. The target receiver had beaten his man deep off the line of scrimmage. The wide open people were sometimes wide open because of this - and there are two or three defenders when the ball arrives. You usually won’t see this on TV - only when you are at the game and can see the whole 22.
I agree. I have an unpopular opinion about the QB situation: I like it. I actually really enjoyed watching the offense last Saturday, even though we didn't score many points. I liked seeing a lot of different looks and plays and just a dynamic scheme. It was also incredibly obvious that we simply don't have the right personnel on the offensive line to expect a really good spread-style offense this year. It makes me fully understand why we did what we did during the Clemson game. I think given time, we will get better (even throughout this season), but I'm excited to see us follow a similar gameplan against the Citadel. It was a lot of fun to watch for me personally, because I can see the potential that is there when we get better and/or acquire the personnel necessaryPeople keep saying this, but I'm seriously wondering if this is "fake news." I'm not buying it. Show me how, demonstratively, it prohibits the offense from having a leader and developing chemistry and rhythm. I don't think it necessarily does. If there is a QB controversy, then there can be division, but I've heard nothing out the locker room that talks to QB controversy. CGC has been very clear that it is a meritocracy and that the guy who has shown in practice he can do it is going to get his shot. Athletes respect that. Period.
Not to be a jerk.. But it would appear that TO was inserted to move the entire O. As the three plays with LJ at QB before he was inserted was a pass for a 2yd loss...a QB run for 1 yd and a pass for 3 yds..the best play before TO was inserted to move the offense was a penalty that gave the team a first down.View attachment 6638
*TO was inserted to run the ball.
Since I pay money I will talk smack about whoever I want... Get over it!!! Time for folks to get a lil thicker skin.....
Not to be a jerk.. But it would appear that TO was inserted to move the entire O. As the three plays with LJ at QB before he was inserted was a pass for a 2yd loss...a QB run for 1 yd and a pass for 3 yds..the best play before TO was inserted to move the offense was a penalty that gave the team a first down.
I agree with everything you are saying... I just thought I heard the OC DP say he was going to install a scheme that fit his players... So I am wondering why we are not a run heavy team until we can recruit the players that will fit is spread Scheme? I would think that would give us the best chance to win.. The more Wins you get the easier it will be to recuit...But Hey I am just a guy who bought into the Hype and maybe I misunderstood what the OC was going to do...
I sure Hope that Coach Collins does not have to change OC as many times as CPJ had to change DC....
Then they have never tried to get guys to play for a losing HS football team.......very few want to play for a "loser".Are we scheming to win games or win recruits? Some don’t think you have to do the former to succeed with the latter.
Not only was there another wide open receiver, there was nothing but empty space for him to run for at least 15 yards. But he zeroes in on the primary receiver and ignores all the other options.
I drank the Kool aid...I expected better showing the first two games.. I still expect to see six wins this year ..12 to 14 over the next 2 years.. I am not say 20 like CPJ did... I am also excited about the D and the improvements... I am upset about 3 headed QB... But IIWII..Does this mean it’s okay to be critical of CGC and staff now? There has been a very hostile reception of anything approaching such here since his hire.
Agree and hopefully we can settle in on James or TO before the UNC game... I just do not see LJ as a player who is going into his fourth season ATL.... I expect better plays and reads and movement of the offense... James Graham or TO in my book should be named the starter for UNC..I have to observe in his defense that the ability and the cool to scan the field with quick and accurate assessment is something many QB's develop with experience. The reason TO is playing is because he already has experience and the coaches know his ability. The reason the other two are in there is to gain experience and find out their capabilities in game conditions. Obviously, scanning the field is a lot easier in practice than on game day.
If we haven't figured out what we are doing on offense by the time we go up to Temple then we are likely going to lose that game. With a patsy game this weekend followed by a week off we should be able to solidify things before that.I am not a fan of rotating 3 QBs. Two is more manageable , but I am trusting the coaches at this point. I see the first 4 games of this year as PRESEASON in a way. We were NEVER going to beat Clemson, and the next 3 are getting ready for the meat of the schedule.
Now, if we are still rotating 3 by the time UNC shows up , I will be surprised/concerned. Just my 2 cents...
Hoping you are right !If we haven't figured out what we are doing on offense by the time we go up to Temple then we are likely going to lose that game. With a patsy game this weekend followed by a week off we should be able to solidify things before that.
Agree and hopefully we can settle in on James or TO before the UNC game... I just do not see LJ as a player who is going into his fourth season ATL.... I expect better plays and reads and movement of the offense... James Graham or TO in my book should be named the starter for UNC..