whitegoldsphinx
Ramblin' Wreck
- Messages
- 817
After laying an egg last night, we will probably come back and beat UGA this weekend.
After laying an egg last night, we will probably come back and beat UGA this weekend.
To be fair to Banks, at least he is producing consistently.The we are a young team excuse could be a valid one..if they were actually on the floor. AD, Alston, Shembari, and Banks are all upperclassmen getting quality minutes.
I was in the same boat as Peac and wanted him to sit out, but he has shown he is ready and I don't even want to imagine what our record would be right now without him.To be fair to Banks, at least he is producing consistently.
The only glaring weakness I see is Banks needs to get stronger with the ball and not bring it down on offensive rebounds for guards to swipe at.
LOL, Total transparency, I watched the first half on replay and skipped along through the second half because I couldn't watch the defensive effort. That being said, I still think we looked fine offensively, regardless of our shooting woes from outside. I'm not concerned about this game because of the circumstances around it. If this continues, I'll have a different opinion. (and no one cares about your Azz).Other than going 0-11 on 3pt shots in the second half, I guess we looked FINE OFFENSIVELY. My Azz.
Woah woah woah are you saying Banks is even an average defender? The tallest guy who got minutes for GW was 6’6. He is avg 11 a game and dropped 20 on us...I was in the same boat as Peac and wanted him to sit out, but he has shown he is ready and I don't even want to imagine what our record would be right now without him.
The only glaring weakness I see is Banks needs to get stronger with the ball and not bring it down on offensive rebounds for guards to swipe at. Almost everything else has been very productive for us.
You are correctI'll start judging Pastner next year. And I haven't said this before so there's no "We keep saying next year is when we will be better" narrative.
Year 1 he had VERY little talent and the team over-performed.
Year 2 he still had VERY little talent and the team performed around as expected.
Year 3 he's now recruited more talent, but our best player left and we are super young without any ELITE talent.
Year 4 we will have more talent and not be super young. This is when it is fair to start judging, is it not?
That's why I think Josh could be gone after the 2020-2021 season if GT is still in rough shapeI'll start judging Pastner next year. And I haven't said this before so there's no "We keep saying next year is when we will be better" narrative.
Year 1 he had VERY little talent and the team over-performed.
Year 2 he still had VERY little talent and the team performed around as expected.
Year 3 he's now recruited more talent, but our best player left and we are super young without any ELITE talent.
Year 4 we will have more talent and not be super young. This is when it is fair to start judging, is it not?
The we are a young team excuse could be a valid one..if they were actually on the floor. AD, Alston, Shembari, and Banks are all upperclassmen getting quality minutes.
I'll start judging Pastner next year. And I haven't said this before so there's no "We keep saying next year is when we will be better" narrative.
Year 1 he had VERY little talent and the team over-performed.
Year 2 he still had VERY little talent and the team performed around as expected.
Year 3 he's now recruited more talent, but our best player left and we are super young without any ELITE talent.
Year 4 we will have more talent and not be super young. This is when it is fair to start judging, is it not?
Striking out this recruiting period is a huge deal.