I love this move if it happens.. We could run all sorts of trick plays with JT under center and TB as a BB. Maybe even run the wildcat too?
Like all the trick plays we ran with Sims and Days at B-back?
I love this move if it happens.. We could run all sorts of trick plays with JT under center and TB as a BB. Maybe even run the wildcat too?
After his misguided effort to placate Vad Lee, and maybe help the kid succeed, with that funky diamond shotgun, Johnson will run the wildcat when science reveals the sun does in fact circle the earth.Like all the trick plays we ran with Sims and Days at B-back?
After his misguided effort to placate Vad Lee, and maybe help the kid succeed, with that funky diamond shotgun, Johnson will run the wildcat when science reveals the sun does in fact circle the earth.
Trick plays force the defense to stay honest..........you cannot just leave a receiver streaking down the field uncovered if there is a remote chance that the BB can pull up on the sweep and chuck it down field. Same with reverses etc. The possibility forces the D to cover the possibility.To all of you calling for trick plays: Stop. Just stop.
Trick plays are by their nature a low percentage play with huge potential downsides. Trick plays should only be used when your O is being dominated and a normal play has a small success rate. It is a sign of desperation.
Our O has an historically high success rate and you are calling for plays that would REDUCE that success rate. Why???
Like Tim, but bit of a stretch to say hes better than Nesbitt lolAsk yourself this question. If JT were to go out for 5 weeks with a high ankle sprain (I hate even bringing it up), who would you want under center early in 2015? Byerly or Jordan? For me there is very little question to it. The obvious answer is Byerly. He has proven he can run the offense with very little drop off. He is experienced and he is starter quality. In fact, I would even say he is the second best QB CPJ has put on the field here even though he hasn't compiled the stats to prove it. For that reason alone, I feel we have to keep him at QB. He is simply too valuable.
For me, TB at BB would look a lot like Sims at BB. Certainly he will be a physical runner like David, but to expect game breaking ability beyond that of Sims just isn't realistic. While we all appreciate what Sims did for us at the position, 95% of us were calling for something more. There are a lot of questions yet to be answered at BB, but I have to believe, based on comments from those close to the action in combination with what I have seen with my own eyes on tape or scrimmages, that we have some really good options in the program right now beyond TB.
The sad part for me is that TB came to college to play football. He is a really good player in our system, but has found himself in the unfortunate position of arriving at the same time as a phenom in JT. In any other season prior to 2014, TB would probably be starting if he were at this point in his development then. That is life. It is really fun to play. I get that. I just hope he understands that he has at least one fan, in me, who super appreciates the value he adds to this team in his current role.
If it is math I am out. What I might have said was that Johnson would run that shotgun stuff when the Center for Disease Control says that it is cool that food service people shouldn't wash their hands before serving.Fwiw, the sun and the rest of the universe does in fact circle the earth. It's just harder math.
That being said, I agree that Johnson will be making sure that all QB recruits in the future know that the system won't change. Of course, the suggestion of this thread was predicated on Jordan being ready to back-up Justin. I'm optimistic. I agree that it's unlikely that he'll already be as good as Tim or that Tim would be a better B-Back then the running backs who are already competing for that position. However, Sims did ultimately beat-out both Perk (in part because of injury but not entirely) and Zach, so who knows. Synjyn was the back-up QB when Vad was a RS freshman and was moved to A-back by the end of that season. So, if RS Fr Matthew Jordan comes on strong, it's possible, though unlikely, that Tim could be given a different place to contribute. CPJ also likes to give playing time to seniors who have put in the practice time.
At first glance, maybe. But not really. Nesbitt could do some stuff and no doubt he was tough, but every QB in this system has that requirement. From what little we have seen of Byerly he is much smoother with the option and the pitch, he can run, and hard, and he can actually pass the ball. So I don't think it's a stretch. Really, when Nesbitt went down -- after another INT -- how much dropoff occurred with TW?Like Tim, but bit of a stretch to say hes better than Nesbitt lol
Regardless Nesbitt has actually won big games, beat uga, won an acc championship, and taken footballs away from defenders. To say a back up qb with limited snaps is better than that is just a guess/stretch imoAt first glance, maybe. But not really. Nesbitt could do some stuff and no doubt he was tough, but every QB in this system has that requirement. From what little we have seen of Byerly he is much smoother with the option and the pitch, he can run, and hard, and he can actually pass the ball. So I don't think it's a stretch. Really, when Nesbitt went down -- after another INT -- how much dropoff occurred with TW?
What you say is true, but it assumes that the play in question meets your operational definition of a trick play. If we can snap to Byerly and SURPRISE! it's a shotgun passing down and it's no lower percentage of success than other shotgun pass plays, well, then it's not a trick play. Except it's still a surprise pass from a nontraditional passer, so... yeah.To all of you calling for trick plays: Stop. Just stop.
Trick plays are by their nature a low percentage play with huge potential downsides. Trick plays should only be used when your O is being dominated and a normal play has a small success rate. It is a sign of desperation.
Our O has an historically high success rate and you are calling for plays that would REDUCE that success rate. Why???
If it is math I am out. What I might have said was that Johnson would run that shotgun stuff when the Center for Disease Control says that it is cool that food service people shouldn't wash their hands before serving.
It's a bit more than that. It's the abandonment of our primary model of universal motion. Bit hard to reconcile general relativity plus our observations of gravity and the constancy of the speed of light when the entire universe zips around our planet once day.Fwiw, the sun and the rest of the universe does in fact circle the earth. It's just harder math.
It's a bit more than that. It's the abandonment of our primary model of universal motion. Bit hard to reconcile general relativity plus our observations of gravity and the constancy of the speed of light when the entire universe zips around our planet once day.
Doggone it. You guys just stop that already.It's a bit more than that. It's the abandonment of our primary model of universal motion. Bit hard to reconcile general relativity plus our observations of gravity and the constancy of the speed of light when the entire universe zips around our planet once day.
Just picture the "tea cups"Doggone it. You guys just stop that already.