Because he also recruited those 5-star guys to Alabama. Just because it's Alabama doesn't mean those kids fall into your lap - you still have to recruit them, and more importantly, develop them to win championships. This guy has done that.
We probably aren't, coaches are out recruiting. If the staff doesn't change I'm going to be pretty upset.
What resume are you talking about? Not trying to be mean but just because a guy has made a lot of stops doesn't give him a good resume imo. A good resume imo is someone that has produced at those stops.
That is true, but Georgia has always found ways to get around that.....for instance the funding of the basketball arena in Athens, which got state funds because it was also to be used as an agricultural exhibition center. SHEESH
What success? Never cracking a top 25 D at Auburn with talent to spare? Never cracking a top 50 class at GT since he's been back? Just because he made a team better on D in one aspect doesn't mean the D as a whole was better. And his best success was while he was early in his coaching years, what success are you talking about that's been recent? It's not about me already making a decision or having a closed mind, it's about me looking at all the facts as a whole and not just reading something online that's only going to give good info.
I didn't think about Bob Diaco, but that would be a great hire imo.
The Auburn fans I know personally hated him as DC at Auburn. I imagine they are not alone.
Is it still used for that crap? I think it's used solely for basketball now.
If you think that's how recruiting goes for even the top schools like Bama, Clem, Aub, etc. then I'm not really sure what else to say, other than that's a very uneducated and oversimplified way to look at the recruiting process.
Pelton is the first on the hit list for me.
