JacketOff
Helluva Engineer
- Messages
- 2,818
So good that it was better than 141 of PJs 143 games here
Dave Patenaude's Offense
- Thread starter Kennethshannon20
- Start date
WreckinGT
Helluva Engineer
- Messages
- 2,984
Key deserves plenty of blame for last years debacle as well. It’s not all on Coach Pat. Maybe not having all 5 star players with 5 star backups was a difficult transition for him.
WreckinGT
Helluva Engineer
- Messages
- 2,984
Do you really want to turn this into a comparison of CPJs offenses and CDPs offenses? It’s not going to go well.So good that it was better than 141 of PJs 143 games here
Ibeeballin
Im a 3*
- Messages
- 6,047
I was going to make an entire thread on CDP yr 1 to 2 jump but i guess we can keep this going
Offense thru 4 game
Comp: 55%
Pass yds: 239yds
Rush yds: 214yds
3rd down 44%
@CuseJacket if you want a new thread on this, please do so
- Messages
- 10,800
In comparison, Louisville is at 58% completion percentage for the season and some similar offensive numbers.
ACC completion percentages:
1. Trevor Lawrence: 72%
2. Sam Howell: 68%
...
10. James Blackmon: 58%
(not in the top 10, but there’s reason to think Sims can move into the 60% territory)
Passing yards:
1. Kenny Pickett: 1389
2. Chase Brice (Duke): 1263
...
6. Jeff Sims: 944
Passer rating:
1. Trevor Lawrence: 183.4
2. Sam Howell: 163
3. Devin Leary (NCST): 152
...
9. D’Eriq King (Miami): 133.5
10. Jeff Sims: 121.5
Yards per punt:
1. Pressley Harvin: 48yds/punt. (OK, not an offensive stat, but I love seeing us #1 in something)
Rushing stats—no individual players in top 10, but we have multiple great backs.
In yards/game, we’re #5 in the ACC. In Points/game, we’re #12:
| Pass | Rush | Tota | Firs | Pena | Turn | |||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rk | School | G | Pts | Cmp | Att | Pct | Yds | TD | Att | Yds | Avg | TD | Plays | Yds | Avg | Pass | Rush | Pen | Tot | No. | Yds | Fum | Int | Tot |
| 1 | North Carolina | 3 | 37.7 | 19.3 | 28.0 | 69.0 | 261.7 | 2.0 | 39.0 | 245.0 | 6.3 | 3.0 | 67.0 | 506.7 | 7.6 | 12.3 | 11.3 | 2.3 | 26.0 | 9.7 | 91.3 | 0.3 | 1.0 | 1.3 |
| 2 | Clemson | 4 | 42.3 | 25.0 | 36.5 | 68.5 | 310.0 | 2.5 | 38.5 | 185.5 | 4.8 | 2.8 | 75.0 | 495.5 | 6.6 | 14.0 | 8.8 | 2.0 | 24.8 | 6.5 | 60.0 | 0.5 | 0.3 | 0.8 |
| 3 | Virginia Tech | 3 | 42.7 | 11.7 | 23.7 | 49.3 | 193.0 | 1.7 | 46.3 | 299.3 | 6.5 | 3.7 | 70.0 | 492.3 | 7.0 | 7.7 | 14.7 | 1.7 | 24.0 | 4.0 | 28.7 | 0.7 | 0.3 | 1.0 |
| 4 | Notre Dame | 3 | 40.3 | 16.0 | 25.7 | 62.3 | 204.0 | 1.0 | 43.0 | 270.7 | 6.3 | 4.0 | 68.7 | 474.7 | 6.9 | 8.7 | 14.0 | 1.0 | 23.3 | 3.3 | 30.7 | 0.7 | 0.3 | 1.0 |
| 5 | Georgia Tech | 4 | 25.8 | 17.3 | 31.5 | 54.8 | 239.3 | 1.5 | 42.5 | 213.8 | 5.0 | 2.3 | 74.0 | 453.0 | 6.1 | 10.0 | 11.5 | 0.8 | 22.3 | 9.8 | 72.0 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 3.0 |
| 6 | Wake Forest | 3 | 40.3 | 19.3 | 31.7 | 61.1 | 268.0 | 1.0 | 42.7 | 161.7 | 3.8 | 3.3 | 74.3 | 429.7 | 5.8 | 11.0 | 12.0 | 2.3 | 25.3 | 3.0 | 20.3 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.3 |
| 7 | Miami (FL) | 4 | 36.8 | 20.0 | 33.3 | 60.2 | 229.5 | 1.8 | 36.0 | 196.5 | 5.5 | 2.5 | 69.3 | 426.0 | 6.2 | 9.8 | 8.3 | 3.5 | 21.5 | 9.3 | 83.5 | 0.8 | 0.8 | 1.5 |
| 8 | Louisville | 4 | 29.0 | 18.3 | 31.0 | 58.9 | 246.5 | 2.3 | 41.3 | 177.8 | 4.3 | 1.5 | 72.3 | 424.3 | 5.9 | 10.8 | 9.3 | 1.3 | 21.3 | 5.5 | 50.0 | 1.5 | 1.3 | 2.8 |
| 9 | Virginia | 3 | 27.3 | 28.7 | 51.3 | 55.8 | 285.0 | 2.7 | 34.7 | 139.0 | 4.0 | 1.0 | 86.0 | 424.0 | 4.9 | 15.3 | 7.3 | 2.7 | 25.3 | 4.3 | 43.7 | 0.7 | 2.3 | 3.0 |
| 10 | Duke | 5 | 21.6 | 21.2 | 39.4 | 53.8 | 263.0 | 1.0 | 39.4 | 153.4 | 3.9 | 1.2 | 78.8 | 416.4 | 5.3 | 13.0 | 7.6 | 1.4 | 22.0 | 4.2 | 42.6 | 2.0 | 1.8 | 3.8 |
| 11 | Pitt | 5 | 31.6 | 22.8 | 38.0 | 60.0 | 284.2 | 1.6 | 39.2 | 125.4 | 3.2 | 2.2 | 77.2 | 409.6 | 5.3 | 11.6 | 8.0 | 2.6 | 22.2 | 7.2 | 63.4 | 0.4 | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| 12 | North Carolina State | 4 | 34.3 | 18.8 | 31.8 | 59.1 | 240.0 | 2.3 | 40.8 | 162.5 | 4.0 | 2.0 | 72.5 | 402.5 | 5.6 | 10.8 | 9.0 | 2.3 | 22.0 | 9.0 | 77.5 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| 13 | Florida State | 4 | 22.5 | 20.5 | 35.5 | 57.7 | 224.3 | 1.0 | 41.0 | 169.0 | 4.1 | 1.8 | 76.5 | 393.3 | 5.1 | 10.8 | 11.0 | 1.5 | 23.3 | 9.3 | 81.8 | 0.5 | 1.5 | 2.0 |
| 14 | Boston College | 4 | 25.8 | 24.8 | 38.0 | 65.1 | 295.3 | 2.0 | 32.3 | 60.3 | 1.9 | 1.0 | 70.3 | 355.5 | 5.1 | 13.5 | 5.8 | 2.0 | 21.3 | 7.3 | 66.8 | 0.3 | 0.5 | 0.8 |
| 15 | Syracuse | 4 | 19.3 | 14.0 | 28.8 | 48.7 | 176.5 | 1.3 | 33.3 | 77.5 | 2.3 | 0.5 | 62.0 | 254.0 | 4.1 | 7.0 | 4.3 | 1.3 | 12.5 | 6.3 | 60.8 | 0.3 | 0.8 | 1.0 |
[thead] [/thead]
Provided by CFB at Sports Reference: View Original Table
Generated 10/11/2020.
Heisman's Ghost
Helluva Engineer
- Messages
- 4,399
- Location
- Albany Georgia
UNC is averaging over 500 yards per game...that is pretty impressive. We are 5th (I think I am reading this right) in total yards, but tied for 12th in points. Therein lies the problem an offense that is not efficient due to turnovers. Fix that and a lot of things will be better. We are averaging 74 plays a game that is a lot. Much to my surprise we are not in last place in turnovers but not that far either from Duke who is last. Clemson, Virginia Tech, and Notre Dame are all averaging over 40 points a game and Carolina is not that far off. What we have here every Saturday is a track meet masquerading as a football game.
Supersizethatorder-mutt
Banned
- Messages
- 13,443
- Location
- Augusta, GA
Until Friday night, that has been the problem --- good yards but few points on the board. Let's hope that whatever DP did Friday night, and in preparing for Friday night, he continues to do. I had no use for the man at all until Friday night game. Now I have a lot of hope.
Heisman's Ghost
Helluva Engineer
- Messages
- 4,399
- Location
- Albany Georgia
Well, having Sims and Gibbs are two good reasons for hope, that and what seems to be a steadily improving offensive line. Defense...what's that?
Supersizethatorder-mutt
Banned
- Messages
- 13,443
- Location
- Augusta, GA
The coach who shall not be named had decent talent too, and he couldn't win any and fortunately was dumped in favor of O'Leary.
Jacketman99
Ramblin' Wreck
- Messages
- 944
I doubt CDP has been calling interception and fumbling plays. Most of the turnovers are directly related to inexperience. We have started 3 and sometimes 4 true freshmen on offense. When we cut out the turnovers we will score more points. It is extremely obvious some of you have an agenda.
D-man44
Helluva Engineer
- Messages
- 1,799
You sound like an expert yourself maybe they should hire you! You sound like you know more than the OLine coach that came from Alabama I’m sold on you!
- Messages
- 10,800
I think that this is a good thread for @ibeattetris
ncjacket79
Helluva Engineer
- Messages
- 1,237
No they just give you 2 outliers to base your crazy theory on.
WreckinGT
Helluva Engineer
- Messages
- 2,984
Yeah, I’m not sure the concept that guys can learn fast if taught well is all that crazy. Again, Nebraska went from a triple option to a west coast offense and ran it with a 3 star guy recruited to play in an option offense. Their two most recent recruiting classes were ranked 39th and 41st. They managed to actually improve on offense having several 400+ and 500+ yard games and averaging more points per game than they did the year before. How did they accomplish such an impossible feat? They weren’t a great team by any means but they had no problem with their monumental transition on offense.
WreckinGT
Helluva Engineer
- Messages
- 2,984
I don’t know more than him, but I do know that he did a pretty poor job last season.
Heisman's Ghost
Helluva Engineer
- Messages
- 4,399
- Location
- Albany Georgia
I don't want to talk about him. It took me a year of watching Coach O'Leary to realize that is what a real coach looks like.
ncjacket79
Helluva Engineer
- Messages
- 1,237
When is it you’re talking about, when Osborne stepped down? And they never ran a 3O based offense under Osborne either.
WreckinGT
Helluva Engineer
- Messages
- 2,984
When Solich was fired. He also ran an option offense.