I'm also on the side of him recruiting and not trying to answer X's and O's. Clearly, as he said, he puts branding number one, and if we want better athletes on the field, this is how it's done. That said, we don't have an X's and O's answer, either. We need to put a staff together, and reshuffle the roster to fit a different scheme. I don't think he could know the answer at this time, anyway.
I do fear we're headed for a Bama or UGAg model. Much more conservative which pans out nicely when you have got superior talent. But I don't think we're going to leapfrog Clemson or UGAg. I don't want to be, e.g., South Carolina in the ACC.
But we'll see. There are ways to be innovative that aren't by running a different scheme. We might have to wait for the dividends to come in. I hope he can sustain support for the program in that time. Filling the stadium and bringing in donor money and having a positive image in the minds of HS coaches and the media are needed.