Actually, to date, there is only a sample size of 3. The poster on the original article is one, @Animal02 is one, who provided a supporting opinion (not his, but the person he spoke to), and @GTJake who provided a disagreeing opinion (again, not his, but the person he spoke to). So at this point, it is 2 - 1 "against" CCG.
Make it 3-2. I know 2 Temple fans. One thinks he was a decent coach & if he had stayed around could have won a bunch of games. The other thinks he’s the consummate used car salesman and was cheering when he left.
Yes, and remember, an OPINION posted by anyone on here is just that....an OPINION. Observations must be made by someone with intimate connections to the Temple program, or repeated here by someone privy to those observations.
Omg! That is epic!!!
I don't know anyone who went to Temple but I have a cousin who lives be next door to someone who does know a guy who has a friend who went to Temple . Nevermind he went to Rutgers but wants me to tell y'all he likes their coach. I need more beer.
Was he more style than substance at MSU and Florida?
Totally different being a position coach and the head man. Also, it’s really hard to say since you typically don’t really hear much about a position coach and wasn’t he only at each school for two years. Good position coaches don’t always make good HC. Like I said we will have to wait until the end of the season.
Trying to get 5* players to stay out of jail & actually do what they’re told to do or not to always rely on their physical ability to make up for being out of position is a lot different than trying to improve the physical skill or technique of a high character kid that knows the playbook like the back of his hand but can’t get his body in the correct position at the right moment.
