OK. Just wanted to check that, in the event the rules & rulings allow our players to only have to sit the 2 exhibitions and play against UCLA, something we have no idea to be the case, you prefer they sit longer and put us at a competitive disadvantage. Fully understood.
Well you got me there. I do have no idea what they did...and therefore, what the proper punishment would be. I certainly can see broken rules resulting in a punishment that would not warrant being suspended for the UCLA (in this case). I'm not saying no matter what they did we have to have them sit for UCLA. The timing simply sets up to allow for plenty of room for criticism (maybe unjustified). It sucks we have guys failing to meet a standard...wish it weren't happening.
This might be worst than sitting games.
Thank you @dtm1997. I only post things that I have verified from staff members or people very close to staff members. I’m not here for accolades or trying to rush to beat someone to a scoop. I’m not sure why someone would question my info and allude to me being a poser? It’s funny how bad news brings the football guys out to the basketball board. If they stick around they’ll see that I’m legit. If they doubt me then they can just put me on ignore.
Why are there "football guys" and basketball guys? We are all fans of Tech sports, no need for nuanced division. Other than than, I appreciate your insight into the program.
By that I mean fans who usually hang out in the football board and rarely post on the basketball board. Not really meant to start a war or cause division. It’s just that I’m seeing more than the usual fonts who post over here commenting on the negative but haven’t seen them commenting on the positives. Thank you for your appreciation of my insight. I try to share all that I am allowed to share.
It was supposed to be released today. Not sure what the delay is.
