Here's my analysis. I like to look at game from five points of view ... Field Position, Efficiency, Explosiveness, Turnovers, and Responding to Scores.
I still need data on FP, but the rest is actually ok. We lost the battle on Efficiency since we scored 0.89 points per minute vs. their 1.25 points per minute if you look at how well Pitt moved the ball. We matched them with a runback, which is nice, but you can't always count on those.
Explosiveness is generally yards/play. And we were in a dead heat ... 6.7 vs. 6.6. No advantage there.
Turnovers were +1 for us.
Responding to Pitt scores, we should have been more aggressive. However, we did run some nice 4th downs and except for the last one (which I don't agree with), we were in position to win.
I still see this game as one we lost ... mostly due to lack of a defense. I think CPJ needs to speak more about how he is going to fix that rather than than always talk about the offense.
The bigger issue is how are we going to improve on this? I don't know CPJ's management style, but he should have an After Action Review and ask his staff why they let a game they should have won get away.