If there is something negative to write or spin, Ken is on it.
He says we needed 2 or 3 studs, but then said we missed on all of them. Later sneaking back in we actually did get 2 guys - 1 is a top 125 4-star player (Usher) and 1 who looks to be a diamond in the rough in Price. True, we missed on some key people we thought we would get, but that is always the case too.
He also brings up the NCAA issues, as if kids care about that. We lost players over the last few years to UNC and Duke, when they were right in the middle of the fake classes thing and payments to players. Zion for example is a double whammy - there is evidence of people on wiretaps asking for large sums of money and there is evidence of ongoing payments to Zion's mom. Who here thinks that doesn't matter compared to a former player going out on the town for a few hours with a recruit? Give me a break.
Ken also states with pessimism our ability to get back to the tournament, without mentioning that we get like 5 of our top 6 scorers back. For the first time in several years. We'll have 4 guys on our team next year rated 4-stars and in the top 125 nationally.
I don't and wouldn't expect him to write a glowing review of our basketball program, but the 99% negative/1% positive, leaving out key context part is really sad for being a local journalist. The guy's just a power tool.