My bad. You are right. The one offs are the norm. Sorry. Lol. 1994. Do you remember that year. Hmmm. I wonder why. Jeez dude. Classic tech person find the one example in 90 years to prove nothing.
Curry years. Typically better talent on D overall. A bit less on O imo but did have some very good running backs like Lavette and Mays. But compared to our rivals less talent overall every year.
Ross, better overall talent and probably the best balance of talent in all 3 phases I have seen in my life. Some outstanding O players at the skill positions. 90 was magical and the D improved that year with some studs on that side as well; M Coleman, Coleman Rudolph, Ken Swilling, Willy Clay. 91 we lost many of those stars and began to revert to the median.
Bill Lewis (sorry I had to)
O'Leary, defensive guru, managed to bring back Fridge an offensive guru. Had some great talent on O. Not so much on D. Not with any depth anyway.
Gailey, an offensive guru who brought in Tenuta. Talent skewed pretty heavily to D with the exception of Megatron and Choice. Those 2 didn't have a wealth of talent surrounding them.
CPJ. Talent heavy on O. Multiple DCs. Weak front 7s typically with at most one stud at a time any given year.
What's the consistent theme? Outside of 1990 Tech has struggled immensely to field a team laden with talent on O and D in any given year. There is always a lack of depth and typically one unit is skewed with more talent than the other.
We aren't a factory. When we succeed we do do in spite of that. Better coaching has allowed us to do better in this regard periodically.