- Messages
- 19,625
Tech going for the sweep, dwags staring down the barrel of an 0-4 week. Screw RPI, this is glorious.
Since willingham pitches yesterday, gotta assume that Brandt is good to go today, right?Yes, life is great in college baseball this week. Lucy has the flu ........
Up to #6 in rpi this morning. Hard to believe where we are right now. At a dinner party last night, I pointed out that we are 9th of 297 teams. Anyway, that points out there is a lot more downside when you are at the top; but ain't it beautiful. We win today we pick up 7 rpi points, we lose and we lose 58. ugag is 5th and only 48 points in front. How about we win and they lose......... again. Rinse and repeat.
Interesting Chapman came back the next day and pitched great again. He had pitched a total of 9 innings all year before Friday. Now up to 11. I love giving guys a chance in limited doses. 2 ER from a HBP and a double followed by sacs. Willingham had a HBP too, but the DP in the 8th had to crush Clemson.
No problems "earning or deserving" that win. While GT and Clemson had 14 hits each, Clemson gave up 7 BB to our 2. (Both teams had 2 HBP.) So walks killed Clemson in the end. We got away with two errors which is always worrying.
For today's game, Clemson has to be depleted in pitchers. I don't have the Friday stats on pitch count, but Clemson used 5 pitchers to our four. Yesterday they used 5 to our 3 (and Chapman was a repeat.) Yesterday we saw 165 pitches (20.6 per inning in 8 innings!!) and Clemson saw 146 (16.2 per inning in 9 innings). In total Clemson has used 10 pitchers but two have only faced one hitter. So we have the advantage. But the baseball Gods are cruel. Just not yesterday.
Yes, life is great in college baseball this week. Lucy has the flu ........
Up to #6 in rpi this morning. Hard to believe where we are right now. At a dinner party last night, I pointed out that we are 9th of 297 teams. Anyway, that points out there is a lot more downside when you are at the top; but ain't it beautiful. We win today we pick up 7 rpi points, we lose and we lose 58. ugag is 5th and only 48 points in front. How about we win and they lose......... again. Rinse and repeat.
Interesting Chapman came back the next day and pitched great again. He had pitched a total of 9 innings all year before Friday. Now up to 11. I love giving guys a chance in limited doses. 2 ER from a HBP and a double followed by sacs. Willingham had a HBP too, but the DP in the 8th had to crush Clemson.
No problems "earning or deserving" that win. While GT and Clemson had 14 hits each, Clemson gave up 7 BB to our 2. (Both teams had 2 HBP.) So walks killed Clemson in the end. We got away with two errors which is always worrying.
For today's game, Clemson has to be depleted in pitchers. I don't have the Friday stats on pitch count, but Clemson used 5 pitchers to our four. Yesterday they used 5 to our 3 (and Chapman was a repeat.) Yesterday we saw 165 pitches (20.6 per inning in 8 innings!!) and Clemson saw 146 (16.2 per inning in 9 innings). In total Clemson has used 10 pitchers but two have only faced one hitter. So we have the advantage. But the baseball Gods are cruel. Just not yesterday.
I think that is a fair assumption. However, his problem (arm tightness) just sounds like something that could flare up anytime. I say that as just a guy... not a medical professional in any sense.Since willingham pitches yesterday, gotta assume that Brandt is good to go today, right?
Yea on RPI, comparing GT to uGA really gives you a sense of the screwiness of the formula. We’re almost identical in record, and they’re just a hair ahead in the rankings. But then look at how they are well over 100 in OOC SOS. They’re 15-1 in Q4 games and we’ve played half that many. There is a huge downside to losing bad games, but the best I can tell you don’t get any penalty for scheduling soft as long as you win. Play 0.500 in conference and runbthe table against terrible teams and you’ll be ranked highly.
I think you can do this... switch Guldberg & English (DH & 1B).. to keep them both in batting order... but if English goes from DH to pitch... the DH is burned. ...but I'm on record as being stumped/unsure on DH/P... sub subtleties.Hurter to start.
English at 1st, Webb at 3rd, Guldberg dh. Rest standard.
Can English go from 1st to dh to pitcher? Or 1st to pitcher to dh?
Going to chat.
I'm pretty sure that we have done that with English before.I think you can do this... switch Guldberg & English (DH & 1B).. to keep them both in batting order... but if English goes from DH to pitch... the DH is burned. ...but I'm on record as being stumped/unsure on DH/P... sub subtleties.
Since the stupid idiot dwags couldn't figure it out, here one more time is the scouting report for how to pitch to Kyle McCann:
And if you don't pay attention, here is what happens: