Squints
Helluva Engineer
- Messages
- 1,254
Here is a timeline of events: https://www.sbnation.com/2016/9/11/...-anthem-protest-seahawks-brandon-marshall-nfl
The incident that was noticed happened on August 26th. The statement referred to in the article you posted was given on August 28th. If my math is correct, that is two days later.
And from that time line:
Kaepernick told the media after the game he sat because of the oppression of people of color and ongoing issues with police brutality.
The only statement referenced in the article I posted is:
"I am not going to stand up to show pride in a flag for a country that oppresses black people and people of color," Kaepernick told NFL Media in an exclusive interview after the game. "To me, this is bigger than football and it would be selfish on my part to look the other way. There are bodies in the street and people getting paid leave and getting away with murder."
If my understanding of the words "interview after the game" are correct the interview happened after the game. On the 26th. It's in the embedded video as well.
So, I am correct in saying that he had an off the cuff response to questions the day of the event, and then released an official statement two days later.
You would indeed be correct. But this isn't what you said in your first post. You may not put a lot of faith in off the cuff statements but it happened.
I said that I can't say for certain that he wasn't protesting, but I don't put a lot of faith in off the cuff remarks which could be an attempt to cover for perceived wrongdoing.
I understood you. And like I said that seems overly cynical IMO. He covered for perceived wrongdoing by going to bat for one of the most polarizing issues in the country today? Is his continued work for that cause just still cover over a year later? I have a hard time buying that. That's all I'm saying. I'm not trying to change your mind.
Also, read the last four paragraphs in the article that you linked to. Kaepernick had requested a trade. His relationship with 49er's management was soured. He wasn't happy. Kelly said that there had not been any talk about cutting him. However the media was speculating wildly that he would be cut.
I remember all of this as it was happening. The 49ers were a mess at the time and it's why they cleaned house after the season. His leash with them the previous season was very short. Not surprising he was unhappy. All true. But the national sports media blew the situation out of proportion.
As to his career: He does not fit the prototypical NFL QB model. When he was playing well, you could build an offense around him as SF did. However, he doesn't fit to roll into an offense as a backup in my opinion. The offense would have to be adjusted to fit his style. I think that is one negative that Vick had in Atlanta. When he broke his leg, the offense couldn't adjust well to the backup. Tebow wasn't the same style QB as Vick or Kaepernick, but he had the same issue. Most NFL positions are made for sit in the pocket passers. Vick, Tebow, nor Kaepernick fit that model. Vick was on another level of athleticism than the other guys, and that is why his career lasted longer. I don't believe that Kaepernick is out of a job because of his protests. I believe his career was ending before any of this began.
I've spent more time dissecting Kap the QB on the internet than I care to admit so not much of an argument from me here. Except your last two sentences. He definitely presents a challenge if you're trying to incorporate him in your roster and his game has got warts. But while his protests probably aren't the main reason he hasn't gotten a job, if you don't think they've played some kind of role you're not paying attention. Look what happened with the Ravens.