JacketFromUGA
Helluva Engineer
- Messages
- 4,897
AM I the only one who listened to it and didn't feel like he was Venting at all? Rather just reminding people to have the correct mindset and calibrations when looking at college football.
AM I the only one who listened to it and didn't feel like he was Venting at all? Rather just reminding people to have the correct mindset and calibrations when looking at college football.
I've heard every time he's said it as well. Never have aI felt like he was venting rather just "telling it like it is." The times he sounds fed up I have always thought it was him being fed up at the reporters for not understanding and continuing to ask about it.If this was a one time quote, then yes. However, he has said this same thing repeatedly just before the season and throughout. I'm at every radio show, and this isn't the first time it has been brought up.
Bingo! My solution? start winning games that matter, then we can talk about facilities upgrade! Has any of us ever asked our company for a raise without first proving we deserved one??Shut up johnson and start winning!I completely agree with the article. He has drawn a line in the sand with his continued comments on the subject. It will be really interesting to see how this shakes out with Stansbury. I almost feel like he's building excuses for performance with hopes to save his job on the one excuse. In my opinion, he should be able to recruit regardless.
I've heard every time he's said it as well. Never have aI felt like he was venting rather just "telling it like it is." The times he sounds fed up I have always thought it was him being fed up at the reporters for not understanding and continuing to ask about it.
People hear what they want to hear I guess.
I've heard every time he's said it as well. Never have aI felt like he was venting rather just "telling it like it is." The times he sounds fed up I have always thought it was him being fed up at the reporters for not understanding and continuing to ask about it.
People hear what they want to hear I guess.
By not having the fan support
Ya'll need to read the comments here
I found this comment particularly enlightening. Just think for a second about the difference in fan and administrative support for Clemson and us from 2008-2009 onward. Look at the level of investment it took in top tier coordinators (Morris and Venables were the two highest paid coordinators I believe). The big thing that happened at Clemson is that they had a hungry fanbase that was already filling that stadium and lived and breathed Clemson football. As soon as they actually started winning it became a machine. By not having the fan support (and money that comes from it!) we haven't been able to latch onto momentum of years like 2008-2009 and 2014. This is the type of commitment and expectation CPJ is talking about.
The problem is that Hummer didn't bother to post CPJ's COMPLETE answer, only the part that fit his (Hummer's) agenda.He was asked a question and he answered it. He didn't say anything wrong and it was completely twisted. How does anyone deserve to have something they say twisted? That doesn't make any sense to me.
Yep he missed the part where cpj asked if we can beat Clemson and then answered his own question with sure.The problem is that Hummer didn't bother to post CPJ's COMPLETE answer, only the part that fit his (Hummer's) agenda.
Bingo! My solution? start winning games that matter, then we can talk about facilities upgrade! Has any of us ever asked our company for a raise without first proving we deserved one??Shut up johnson and start winning!
Bingo! My solution? start winning games that matter, then we can talk about facilities upgrade! Has any of us ever asked our company for a raise without first proving we deserved one??Shut up johnson and start winning!
The AJC will never put Georgia Tech Athletics in a positive light if they can help it.The problem is that Hummer didn't bother to post CPJ's COMPLETE answer, only the part that fit his (Hummer's) agenda.
I completely agree with the article. He has drawn a line in the sand with his continued comments on the subject. It will be really interesting to see how this shakes out with Stansbury. I almost feel like he's building excuses for performance with hopes to save his job on the one excuse. In my opinion, he should be able to recruit regardless.
I think what Paul is talking about is budget for staff. We ARE woefully behind in that department, specifically, resources (money) for recruiting staff. IIRC, Clemson has 3 to 4 times the number of bodies we do dedicated to recruiting research and organization. I'm not sure of the exact numbers, but it was significant. And Paul is exactly right. If anybody needs additional resources dedicated to targeting prospective student athletes, it's us, especially compared to the factories.
And I guess I should expect you to bench 400 lbs without weight training? Or build a rocket to Mars on a Volkswagen budget? Those are my goals for you and you should be able to do both regardless.
On a more serious note. He has been recruiting and it has gotten better IMO. The last two classes in particular. Now just imagine for a moment....how much better even that would have been....with a dozen on staff? (1/3 Clemson or Bama staffs)....and facilities that match the competition.
It's fine to want Bama level recruiting. But it's unrealistic to expect it with the current level of support. Do we have an indoor facility? Yes. Does that help? Yes. Does it compete with the one at Tennessee? No. Do we have player lounges like Clemson or Oregon? No.
I'm not saying we have to out do the factories. But if we want better recruits our staff and facilities have to at least compare. They just do not currently. The factories are in a different stratosphere.