But that’s part of why I think this pool format is stupid. If Duke wins, WE SHOULDNT EVEN PLAY TOMORROW. ND would already be eliminated. We should then get a Bye and play Duke to see who advances.
Yeah I use useless in the sense of the ACC tournament. I get why they have the extra games because it gives teams a chance to add a few wins to make the regionals, but it really only benefits the bottom and middle teams. If Duke wins, Tech gains nothing by beating ND. It’s a Q4 team that we are expected to beat, but losing likely cost us a national seed unless we make the championship game. Personally I think the format should be the top four seeds get byes, and just play the winner of the first game.
I am not a big fan of the format myself. But if you are the ACC, you want to put on a tournament that balances several competing priorities... in no particular order:
1) No more than 4 games played by a team over the 6 days.
2) Leave out no NCAA bid "potential" teams. That usually means 10+ teams.
3) Give teams more than a single game
to help resume.
4) Attract fans... this is why format produces Sat semi-finals (previous format had pool play thru Sat & no Semifinals round).
You guys are right... the format has a lot left to be desired.
@Southpawmac probably points out the most egregious. Top seeds (like Tech) end up in a no-win game that can only hurt them wrt committee/ RPI.
The SEC has a 12 team tournament. I think I like their format better... but it fails short in some ways too. Namely IIRC... a team can be required to play 6 games to win it. That's too many in my opinion.