Is there any chance that they pull an “osu being put in the playoffs over conference champ penn state( like last year) with Bama and the pups?
I'm for an 8-game playoff with nobody getting a bye. Giving byes would turn out to be as subjective as what we already have. Let all conference champions prove themselves.I said this in another thread, but the playoffs should be 6 teams. The 5 conference champions and then the best G5 team/Notre Dame. 1 and 2 would get a bye because they earned it and 3 would play 6, 4 would play 5. This is the system that makes the most sense because you can keep the regular season schedule at 12 games and you don't go overboard with the amount of games. It also makes it easy and rewards conference champions.
You said it better than I did.I've said since Day 1, 8 teams, Power 5 conference champions and 3 at large. Want to get a true NC? That's the format imo
Sorry I meant Bama in pups out.Last year Ohio State had 3 top 10 wins, which was the same amount as the rest of the playoff field combined. this year will trully bring up the question. Last year PSU didnt even have the division clinched until the controversial spot in The Big Game. The commitee values good wins first and foremost (why clemson is #1 instead of OU or UGA. if bad losses mattered, they would be third. end of story). And I believe Ohio state with wins over wisconsin, Michigan, MSU, and Penn State has a far better resume than Bama whose best wins are Mississippi State. Fresno State, and LSU.
USC has a small outside shot, as they are 2-loss confrence champ and their only two losses came in games where they had 9+ starters out due to injuries (that are back now)
issue is that they dont really have a whole lot of good wins (Stanford x2 and thats about it)
16 team Playoff would be better just like the FCSI'm for an 8-game playoff with nobody getting a bye. Giving byes would turn out to be as subjective as what we already have. Let all conference champions prove themselves.
Pups beat everyone they played ala 2014 Oregon so they are in. Pseudo undefeatedSorry I meant Bama in pups out.
But I don’t think they are the best team in their conference. In a month I think Bama would beat the pups and Don’t think they will take two from one conference. If I’m cu I want osuPups beat everyone they played ala 2014 Oregon so they are in. Pseudo undefeated
Who called it? This guy!!! Boom SEC privledge at its best.
I disagree. They had a weak strength of schedule. The blind test, would pick USC. Better numbers.ehh. They deserved it most.
You shocked???? Ugag has more arrests than wins.UGAG linebacker Natrez Patrick was arrested on a misdemeanor charge and bond was set at 1,030 dollars. He was arrested for smoking pot in October and he was probably smoking it again.
I expected someone to get arrested after their win over AuburnYou shocked???? Ugag has more arrests than wins.
I disagree. They had a weak strength of schedule. The blind test, would pick USC. Better numbers.
Wisconsin against USC in the Rose Bowl will be a good matchupUSC beat one ranked opponent and lost to two. So no, the blind test would not pick them. USC was 2-2 against ranked teams. Bama was 2-1, with Freso State on the fringe. Committee values good wins (which neither really has, but Bama's are definetely better) USC and Ohio state both lost games by over 30 points. Bama doesn't have any blowouts.
That and the PAC-12 was awful this year.
It needs to be expanded to 16 then nobody will beeitchHow long before they expand the playoffs?