GT players needed reps. What was unusual about playing starters to get experience?Except on the O Line, D Line, LB, RB and secondary.
GT players needed reps. What was unusual about playing starters to get experience?Except on the O Line, D Line, LB, RB and secondary.
he wanted us to win the game 84-0 and is upset we didn’t get in a position to rest our startersGT players needed reps. What was unusual about playing starters to get experience?
Participation report says otherwise. In real time, I was encouraged seeing Grey Carroll get action in the 4th quarter.
Here was our 1st string:
View attachment 13017
Here's everybody else who played:
View attachment 13018
Feel free to redact your comment at any point.
I seriously thought he saw the blue jersey and gold pants and had a brain-fart, thinking he was throwing it to one of our receivers. It was right to the defender and well away from where the receiver was going to be.It drove me crazy when he stepped out of bounds on that play. He has often shown a lack of awareness of the sticks. And he’s lucky he didn’t have another pick on that play where it looked like he was playing catch with the DB. His generally unfocused play reminded me of how he came out in the NIU game. Maybe he lacks focus when he’s playing lower level competition.
Dare I say, once again, get your facts straight before you start slinging crap.That wasn't the firsr
3- 9 three years in a row. Can't dominate a team tech should be beat by 40. Dare i say he has jumped bi@#& fing lew%$ as the worst coach in tech history.
don’t let reality get in the way of a good narrativeDare I say, once again, get your facts straight before you start slinging crap.
There were no false starts or illegal substitution penalties on the Offense last night. All our penalties were courtesy of the defense.
charlie thomas really stood out second half. probably whyI liked our adjustments on Defense after the first quarter. I thought our Linebackers were still in the locker room getting dressed.
Participation report says otherwise. In real time, I was encouraged seeing Grey Carroll get action in the 4th quarter.
Here was our 1st string:
View attachment 13017
Here's everybody else who played:
View attachment 13018
Feel free to redact your comment at any point.
I’m sure we’ve all had brain farts and this is not beyond the realm of possibility. Definitely it was a mistake in recognizing where his receiver was. Can’t afford to have those often though.I seriously thought he saw the blue jersey and gold pants and had a brain-fart, thinking he was throwing it to one of our receivers. It was right to the defender and well away from where the receiver was going to be.
You misinterpret my comment. I was showing that the starters did not play the whole game.GT players needed reps. What was unusual about playing starters to get experience?
Tatum played quite well as a LB in the 4th Qtr. Is he 1st string. Well know. J More had a sack in the 4th qtr. Again is he a starter? Well know. But you can believe what you want.This board does realize Tech played its first team the entire game. Let that soak in.
That’s really not a stout participation list considering we’re playing a 1-aa team. You do know there’s special teams, the 3 RB rotation we got, etc on that “extra” list? We played basically 1st and 2nd string and special teams on this total list of 55. Maybe 1 or 2 guys on the 3 deep played.Participation report says otherwise. In real time, I was encouraged seeing Grey Carroll get action in the 4th quarter.
Here was our 1st string:
View attachment 13017
Here's everybody else who played:
View attachment 13018
Feel free to redact your comment at any point.
You are correct. It is easy to throw this stuff out when Collins only wins 3 games a year. Win more games and he'll get less criticism.Negative Post. Maybe you think this Is funny. We’ll either have a new coach or move forward with Collins. Support the team. It is easier to sit behind a key board and throw this stuff out.
I’m not sure how much of the defensive improvement was adjustments vs. how much was added intensity, but the defense improved for an entire quarter before Charlie came into the game. Yes, Charlie is great, and got an INT with a nice return, but we just weren’t ready for the first two series of the game. After that, we were much better on defense.charlie thomas really stood out second half. probably why
I agree, I wish we got deeper into 3rd string yesterday. I think it’s likely that short rest from game 1 made it harder to get the necessary separation. To what extent, I don’t know.That’s really not a stout participation list considering we’re playing a 1-aa team. You do know there’s special teams, the 3 RB rotation we got, etc on that “extra” list? We played basically 1st and 2nd string and special teams on this total list of 55. Maybe 1 or 2 guys on the 3 deep played.
As the season goes along you need those 3 deep guys to get playing time. If #1 or #2 does down, or both, the 3 deep is now needing to be on the field, maybe even with the game hanging in the balance. They need to be ready.
Dare I say, once again, get your facts straight before you start slinging crap.