UNC 2024 Post Game

slugboy

slugboy

Moderator
Staff member
Messages
11,490
kg01 said:
I hear Benny Hill music whenever I see him coaching(sic).



Kobe Bryant GIF


Do better, NE.
Click to expand...
I'd like to see a UNC game highlights reel backed by "yackety sax"

------

Hampton has had a great season, and it's questionable whether UNC will make a bowl right now



He had a day on Saturday


PlayerStat lineYards/playEPA/playEPASRWPA
Omarion Hampton18 carries, 170 yds, 0 TD, 0 Fum (0 lost)9.440.213.7644%3.0%

Haynes was a little better

PlayerStat lineYards/playEPA/playEPASRWPA
Jamal Haynes19 carries, 178 yds, 2 TD, 0 Fum (0 lost)9.370.458.4942%80.0%
 
stinger78

stinger78

Helluva Engineer
Messages
4,266
slugboy said:
So, this happened. We scored on "money down"

Click to expand...

Obviously, TFG doesn’t really need money, cause he isn’t getting much off money down. Otherwise, he’d change up something. You know, one definition of insanity… oh, hmm… never mind.
 

LT 1967

Jolly Good Fellow
Messages
497
Coach Key's explanation concerning GT not trying many deep passes during the UNC game. I paraphrase, but he basically said that he changed plan once he recognized that the UNC plan was to keep everything in front of them and trying to limit the deep pass. So, he changed plan to emphasize the running game. See "Changing the Plan of Attack." in article below.

www.ajc.com

Takeaways from a Georgia Tech win at North Carolina

Quarterback Haynes King exited with an injury. Tech coach Brent Key did not have an update on his star QB immediately following the game.
www.ajc.com www.ajc.com
 
Last edited:
stinger78

stinger78

Helluva Engineer
Messages
4,266
kg01 said:
I mean, it worked out, but I feel that was more because UNC defense stank. Against a competent D, we definitely would've needed to pass.
Click to expand...
True, but considering the actual situation, opponent D tired and minimally effective vs the run, our 2nd string QB in, I do think the choice was a good one and there was a much higher chance of a chunk play running than passing with far leas risk.
 

Root4GT

Helluva Engineer
Messages
3,032
forensicbuzz said:
That was a BS call. Teams do that every game. They huddle everyone at the sideline at the timeout and then break from the timeout and come onto the field. It's a BS call by the officials that is hardly ever called, but is by the letter-of-the-law,
Click to expand...
You are 100% wrong on that one. It came after the 2 minute timeout. GT huddled and broke a huddle with 12 men on the field.
12 men on the field.jpg
 
Golden Tornadoes

Golden Tornadoes

Ramblin' Wreck
Messages
758
LT 1967 said:
Coach Key's explanation concerning GT not trying many deep passes during the UNC game. I paraphrase, but he basically said that he changed plan once he recognized that the UNC plan was to keep everything in front of them and trying to limit the deep pass. So, he changed plan to emphasize the running game. See "Changing the Plan of Attack." in article below.

www.ajc.com

Takeaways from a Georgia Tech win at North Carolina

Quarterback Haynes King exited with an injury. Tech coach Brent Key did not have an update on his star QB immediately following the game.
www.ajc.com www.ajc.com
Click to expand...
You'll never convince me there was over 44k at that game on Saturday. Maybe 4k. That's numbers inflation if I've ever seen it.
 

GT33

Helluva Engineer
Messages
2,173
kg01 said:
I hear Benny Hill music whenever I see him coaching(sic).
Click to expand...
You nailed it!

Its coaching reminds me of the 3 stooges. Moe pokes Curly in both eyes with his index and middle fingers, Curly puts his hand in front of his nose to block so Moe pokes him in both eyes again using his 2 index fingers.

That person is a dumbass. It’s just who it is, simply put a charlatan.
 
buzzn3

buzzn3

Georgia Tech Fan
Messages
99
Golden Tornadoes said:
Sorry if this has been brought up in another thread, but where was the band yesterday? One of the things I really enjoy is hearing our band being loud and proud at another team's stadium.
Click to expand...
Athletics had to cut various budgets this year, which included the Band and Cheer Squad. This eliminated travel to away games except Ireland which was primarily funded through different means, and u(sic)ga, where they'll be sending a pep band.
 
Northeast Stinger

Northeast Stinger

Helluva Engineer
Messages
10,755
Root4GT said:
You are 100% wrong on that one. It came after the 2 minute timeout. GT huddled and broke a huddle with 12 men on the field. View attachment 16999
Click to expand...

I still contend this rule was changed shortly after Bud Carson ran a “cherry picker offense” against Vince Dooley. It was an attempt to disguise until last minute who the eligible receivers were. Dooley called it “brilliant” or “well conceived,” I forget which, but “someone” took note of this and decided rules needed to be “clarified.”
 

CEB

Helluva Engineer
Messages
2,591
forensicbuzz said:
Depends on the whistle. We couldn’t hear the whistle through the TV. If they blew the whistle before the fumble, then it is what it is. Often times the players are still pushing and pulling after the whistle has blown.
Click to expand...
My understanding of the rule is that a player ruled down by forward progress is not reviewable. Whistle is irrelevant (logic is that the whistle happens “after” the determination is made).

I don’t know what exactly was reviewed on the play, but I don’t think they could rule it a fumble. That’s probably why the announcers didn’t give much explanation.

On the flip side, I do think that replay allows them to determine forward progress was stopped if it was not ruled that way on the field. It’s rare they review it, but I think I’ve seen it in late game situations determining if a player was stopped in play before going OOB. I don’t think I’ve ever seen a retroactive review of forward progress overturning a fumble but in theory, I believe that can happen.
 
4shotB

4shotB

Helluva Engineer
Retired Staff
Messages
4,934
stinger78 said:
True, but considering the actual situation, opponent D tired and minimally effective vs the run, our 2nd string QB in, I do think the choice was a good one and there was a much higher chance of a chunk play running than passing with far leas risk.
Click to expand...
I think some of the fans questioning the play selection during our last possession either didn't see or else forgot that we got the ball with even less time if the first half (36 seconds iirc) and drove into FG range with 3 run plays. That series stopped some of UNC's momentum going into halftime.
 
stinger78

stinger78

Helluva Engineer
Messages
4,266
4shotB said:
I think some of the fans questioning the play selection during our last possession either didn't see or else forgot that we got the ball with even less time if the first half (36 seconds iirc) and drove into FG range with 3 run plays. That series stopped some of UNC's momentum going into halftime.
Click to expand...
Yes. Questioning why we were running at the end of a game in which we had already amassed over 300 yards rushing strikes me as a bit… disconnected?
 

MWBATL

Helluva Engineer
Messages
6,522
stinger78 said:
Yes. Questioning why we were running at the end of a game in which we had already amassed over 300 yards rushing strikes me as a bit… disconnected?
Click to expand...
There’s a difference. When the backup QB comes in, the opposing defense basically expects them to have limited plays and stacks to stop simple run plays. If the starting AB was still in, your point would be spot on, because the defense knows our full playbook is open. I think you throw a pass early with the backup to try to stop the defense from doubling down on simple runs and have to defend against all threats, all plays. Their second level worrying about the pass is what caused our runs to work in the last 30 seconds of each half.
(Btw, my concern about
 
Top