Jmonty71
Banned
- Messages
- 2,156
Very true... Just needed one FG... Just one... In which, has anyone heard about our normal starter? Is he back?Or if Tech's special teams had been excellent Tech would have won in regulation
Very true... Just needed one FG... Just one... In which, has anyone heard about our normal starter? Is he back?Or if Tech's special teams had been excellent Tech would have won in regulation
We don't have a "normal" starter, Neither kicker had started before this season, and, although King has apparently been suffering from a groin injury, he has practiced and lost out to Davis thus far.Very true... Just needed one FG... Just one... In which, has anyone heard about our normal starter? Is he back?
Oh... I thought one was a scholarship player and the other was a walk on. Seems like we need to recruit a kicker, this year.We don't have a "normal" starter, Neither kicker had started before this season, and, although King has apparently been suffering from a groin injury, he has practiced and lost out to Davis thus far.
Florida's defense clearly ran out of gas which is not surprising given they had a bunch of guys suspended. Tired guys miss tackles and that's what Kelly feasted on.
We DO have a scholarship player....King. But he has never started, so he can not be considered "normal." But, as I said, he has had a groin injury and, even though apparently practicing, has not beat out Davis yer.Oh... I thought one was a scholarship player and the other was a walk on. Seems like we need to recruit a kicker, this year.
Yet.... We also have not played high power teams. I agree with the AlabamaBuzz. I have not seen anything to suggest that we will have a D that will break the bottom 35%. I would love to be proven wrong, by the time week 9 rolls around. I think that's when the FEI rankings come out.
If King can't beat Davis then we're in deep ****. All the graphics showing Butker's early misses vs Davis' are a desperate reach, that's not the entire issue. The manner in which Davis shanked his shots is the scary part, not just that he missed a couple of fg's. I don't recall Butker choking to the point, even as a freshman, where he couldn't get off what resembled a field goal. Davis completely crumbled, HUGE difference.
What do we make of it? With every game that passes by the accumulated season stat sheet, especially by common opponents, we get a little bit clearer picture of what we have for a TECH FB team. Going into this week, if I were to ask who has the better defense, UF or TECH? I feel pretty sure the responses would be at least 90% in favor of UF. As most of you know, I am not the least bit swayed by transitive property arguments in CFB. However, there are no results from this game that would raise concerns about our defense in a comparative sense. UF forced 3 TOs and still gave up quite a few more yards and first downs to the Vowels than we did. UT's star RB ran for about a $1.50.
Conversely, if asked who had the better offense, probably 90% or so would have responded positively for TECH. Well, the results of this game reinforced that notion, as the Jackets piled up nearly double the number of yards, first downs, and possession time etc as the Gators did.
Look, I am well aware that our game against UT was the first game of the season for both teams and, as such, doesn't mean too much. However, at the very least, there is a well respected defense out there who produced similar defensive results as we did. Our D then went on to play a pretty good game, by any measure, against Jax St. Who knows? Maybe these are the first two data points in an ensuing, longer term, argument that our defense is better than many projected.
What is it with you and Kelly?
What do we make of it? With every game that passes by the accumulated season stat sheet, especially by common opponents, we get a little bit clearer picture of what we have for a TECH FB team. Going into this week, if I were to ask who has the better defense, UF or TECH? I feel pretty sure the responses would be at least 90% in favor of UF. As most of you know, I am not the least bit swayed by transitive property arguments in CFB. However, there are no results from this game that would raise concerns about our defense in a comparative sense. UF forced 3 TOs and still gave up quite a few more yards and first downs to the Vowels than we did. UT's star RB ran for about a $1.50.
Conversely, if asked who had the better offense, probably 90% or so would have responded positively for TECH. Well, the results of this game reinforced that notion, as the Jackets piled up nearly double the number of yards, first downs, and possession time etc as the Gators did.
Look, I am well aware that our game against UT was the first game of the season for both teams and, as such, doesn't mean too much. However, at the very least, there is a well respected defense out there who produced similar defensive results as we did. Our D then went on to play a pretty good game, by any measure, against Jax St. Who knows? Maybe these are the first two data points in an ensuing, longer term, argument that our defense is better than many projected.
Somebody in this thread was saying he's the best running back we'll see. That, of course, is ridiculous.
You could make the argument about two halves D in the UF-UT game as well. D's get tired, even if it's over 40 snaps vs 60. I still think it's too early to definitively make assessments on either the strengths or weaknesses of our D.
Somebody in this thread was saying he's the best running back we'll see. That, of course, is ridiculous.
I think we CAN DEFINITIVELY say that there is no way our D was "tired" in the UT game, although some have suggested that. If they get tired with that few minutes of playing time, then we have bigger problems than we thought.
Not sure if any of you will remember we had a kicker on scholarship from Columbus ( Brookstone High ) signed in 2002 ( I believe ) and if I remember was on the team all 4 years but could not win the job. It happens sometimes.We DO have a scholarship player....King. But he has never started, so he can not be considered "normal." But, as I said, he has had a groin injury and, even though apparently practicing, has not beat out Davis yer.
Too bad GT doesn't have a Soccer team because a lot of the time you can find a good kicker on a Soccer team.Not sure if any of you will remember we had a kicker on scholarship from Columbus ( Brookstone High ) signed in 2002 ( I believe ) and if I remember was on the team all 4 years but could not win the job. It happens sometimes.
All I can say is that Johnson said if they were tired after so few minutes of playing time, then they didn't deserve to be on the field.No. You can't. There are so many variables that factor into how tired someone gets. For instance, I am a runner. I usually run 20+ miles per week. My body is used to the schedule I keep it on. Monday is a 3 mile tempo run, Tuesday is 3-5 mile intervals, Friday is a 10+ mile distance run, ans Saturday is a recovery run of around 3 miles. I rest on Wed, Thu, and Sun. (And some Saturdays during football season) The other day I varied my schedule and ran a 2 mile tempo run on a Wed after missing the Tuesday run. 2 miles is a short run for me, and you would think with Thursday off I would have been fine. But I sucked wind all day Friday on my run and had to cut it short. It's not always the time you put in, but how hard you play the time you put in. We can keep saying they "shouldn't have" been tired, but we weren't on that field. Either way, it's still too early in the season to really gauge the D just yet. Even Pitt might not be a true test. But we'll know for sure by mid Oct where we stand.