Whiskey_Clear
Banned
- Messages
- 10,486
No, I didn't know that. That's why I was wondering what his status was.
You weren't wondering you were vaguely postulating IMO. Flame on.
No, I didn't know that. That's why I was wondering what his status was.
CM,
it will interesting to see what you think after next yr when he won't have SIX SRS and 2 JRs playing on DEF-- THIS should have been his big yr to carry team,we knew OFF would struggle,the OFFhas been carrying the DEF for yrs with high scoring and TOP.
There is a big difference between carrying a team and being on the field for 35+ minutes a game. No defense that plays that long plays well.
There is a big difference between carrying a team and being on the field for 35+ minutes a game. No defense that plays that long plays well.
I would - fire the corners on the wild cat formation and the zone read plays.Would you guys that want more blitzing have blitzed more vs UVA?
I'm more worried about exotic blitz, not so much how many times. The blitz packages we use for the most part are so predictable. Even on the D line I wish we did more stunts, and things like that.Would you guys that want more blitzing have blitzed more vs UVA?
I don't buy the idea that the poor offense should dictate a more conservative defense. We don't have the personnel to play a conservative defense. Our best chance to win is to go very aggressive and let the chips fall where they may. Being conservative is just a slow death.
Ala, nobody thought the O would struggle. Plug and play, remember...CM,
it will interesting to see what you think after next yr when he won't have SIX SRS and 2 JRs playing on DEF-- THIS should have been his big yr to carry team,we knew OFF would struggle,the OFFhas been carrying the DEF for yrs with high scoring and TOP.
UNC is currently #126 in time of possession and #19 in pnt/drive allowed vs pwr 5 opponents.