I read the link to the UT board. Having done this internet thing for awhile, I have come to the conclusion that any fan of team X who visits the message board of team Y with the hopes of disseminating info and shaping the narrative probably has a better chance of going into a randomly selected mosque in the middle East and converting the congregation to Christianity. I am amazed that people even make the attempt. In 99.998% (estimated, not measured) of the attempts, the "missionaries" of their faith simply do not have enough data and bring snippets of anecdotal data which they fervently believe is enough to offset the same type of anecdotal data that is being used on the other side of the debate. While I applaud the effort, I cannot imagine anything being more futile and wasting more time.
The data must be available to support or refute the hypothesis that cut blocking causes more injuries to defensive players than other forms of blocking. Since I (and apparently no one else) has or have neither the time or inclination to do the research, I think it is more fun (and certainly a much more prudent use of my time) to let other people continue to believe that the probability of knees and careers being shattered is much higher when playing our offense. We are not going to change the narrative without the aforementioned research so we should embrace it and have some fun with it.