Heisman1215
Jolly Good Fellow
- Messages
- 198
TO Hell With The Triple Option. I’ll take the water boy as HC before I want that offense again.
And @Yomanser with the worst news of the day...
To which one of these objections do the great offenses we've had here not provide a counterexample to disprove it? I'll give you number 4, actually - that could be valid, though I'm not convinced of it.
innovateWhy would anyone see KW's offensive as innovative? Also, how can an offense that doesn't incorporate some option be innovative. It doesn't have to be ours. Hell, even Bama runs some option. We ran option with Godsey. What about the Chargers' offense or the Titans' offense was innovative? Was it the flee flicker? I guess if you go back to '81, it was innovative. Idiotic. Frost and Heupel are innovative. No NFL offense is innovative.
Wasp,To be fair, that is a quote from the Chargers' head coach, who says "it wouldn't surprise him" if it's Whisenhunt's job to turn down because he's a great coach. That doesn't necessarily mean that it is.
It's not over until they announce it, but I will be beyond bummed if it is.
Insane that we didn't even bother to reach out to Satterfield for an interview.
Unlikely and I guarantee Todd doesn’t care about some backlash when he has some major money boosters wanting KW
Unless we get turned down by 4-5 folks I’d bet big $ we are moving away from the triple option
We could offer double what Louisville can. Satterfield would be insane not to at least listen especially considering we have his DC.How do you know they didn’t talk? Cell phones and agents have been around more than a second.
It’s possible all of these “names” just ain’t interested.
Guys from a GS perspective don't worry about not hiring Satterfield. He a good coach, but is the product of them having a solid stable situation there. He is not a home run hire by any stretch. I'm a Tech fan also and hope they hire the right guy. From our experience at GS hiring the wrong guy will bring immediate problems. We hit the bottom in less than two years of Tyson Summers. We put ourselves in the worst situation possible with that hire. I would not trade our guy for Satterfield. Coach Lunsford doesn't have to the experience yet for Tech, but at some point we will not be able to keep him. He will be that good.
i am not upset about losing or not bothering with satterfield.
I am more irritated at KW discussion is even relevant. And I would not mind collins or others.
The Appalachian State fans are mad at Scott because he left for 1.2 million when Loserville offered Jeff Brohm 5 millionWe could offer double what Louisville can. Satterfield would be insane not to at least listen especially considering we have his DC.
Hope you are wrong, 33, but starting to think you will not be. I wish I could understand why a big money donor would think that Chan 2.0 makes sense?
If it's a $50m donation I can live with whiz. Hope he gets tee martin on staff.his ego, this donor's ego is beyond reproach. He knows Todd. Knows Ken. He feels he is in a position to control and that is what he likes and does. Power and control w/access is what donors are about...or some I should say. Depends on the person.
The thing thats worse is bud likes ken according to rumors. Thats even worse, because then, Todd can't be fired as easily for a bonehead choice..."they" all got it wrong. But they got the donation.
That donation better be 50 million, at least....