GCdaJuiceMan
Helluva Engineer
- Messages
- 1,967
Replay is on FSS for those interested.
I believe Tech athletics and $hitty officiating go hand in hand.If Coach Collins doesn't call out the refs I'd be shocked! His reaction, throwing the headset and then barely shaking Narduzzi 's(the whiner) hand makes me think he is straight up pissed. As he should be. I have never seen a worse officiated game in my life.
Atrocious. I hope he calls out the ACC refs, takes the fine, and doesn't give a ****. They need to be called out because this game was atrocious.
If you want to get into who's not out there on the line, we did lose Justice Dingle (a 4 star by Rivals) to the portal a few weeks ago and Chimideza early on. Could they have helped? Maybe. So too Jahaziel Lee, who hit the portal early on in the season. You start losing guys like that and anybody's depth, anybody not named Alabama or Clemson, is going to feel it.So we should expect a DL that at times had 5-7 P5 offers to hold up over a season and never get gashed? I'm not writing it off solely on talent, but I literally cannot think of another ACC DL that I would choose ours over, based on who we had to run out there tonight. That means we are at a competitive disadvantage.
You mentioned facts in your first sentence, then followed with pure opinion.Continuing to ignore the facts laid out is ridiculous.
I'm not saying he's some genius, but you and some others act like he should be putting up 40 a game with the "talent" we have. Watch the LOS. It all starts there. We are better than we were last year, but still nowhere near the top half of the ACC there.
Having a guy like Gibbs allows you to cover some of those deficiencies, but he and Brown (our other homerun threat) being out for a large part of the season is more impactful to a GT than most other teams as we transition out of our old offense.
Disagree. We kept them out of the end zone besides the two play drive. We were going to get within one score before a HORRIFIC PI call.Refs sucked, but Tech deserved to lose.
Pitt last year wasn't close. It was 10 points, but that's still double digits (wait, hang on ... carry the one ... yep, double digits) and two scores.Maybe my expectations are lower now but I’m glad our conference losses are at least competitive. Besides the Pitt and UVA games last year I feel like it’s either we win close or get completely killed in conference games. So losing close ones while more painful is improvement at the least.
maybe you should credit our D for being good in the redzone. Besides dropping one in on a converted QB we did that(keep them out).If they had been able to finish drives with TDs instead of field goals it may have been worse.
Coach Collins would not even look at him. They did not show it but just after that photo, Naduzzi was yelling at him as Coach Collins walked away from him. Coach Collins was the one doing the "dissing" it would appear to me. Good thing coaches don't shake hands with officials post game.This is on the ESPN homepage. I hate the headline and that the handshake is the clip they are showing but I do find it humorous that they switched the coaches up
View attachment 9577
Kind of a stretch on both ends though ?The post game media should be...interesting. For Coach Collins it is a coin flip about ripping the officiating. For Pitt's coach he did not like the way Collins dissed him at the post game hand shake. Temperature's rising between those two. This will be like Woody Hayes and Bo Schembelcher back in the day.
NC State beat Pitt by one point in overtime but the whole time I was watching that game, I thought NC State was the better team simply because they had more playmakers, especially at receiver. Pitt has a way of dragging people down to their level with their physical play and pushing the limits on rules and such. It is what they do.Pitt last year wasn't close. It was 10 points, but that's still double digits (wait, hang on ... carry the one ... yep, double digits) and two scores.
This one wasn't either. -
Last week against NC State, as shaky an 8-3 team as there is, was close. But Pitt was 5-5. They're ... not that good. And they won by two TDs.
Yes, the refs were bad. But they didn't give up 250 yards rushing to one of the Lollipop Guild.
Yea, I think our DL attrition falls into that category of “more” than others. And we weren’t starting from a position of strength.If you want to get into who's not out there on the line, we did lose Justice Dingle (a 4 star by Rivals) to the portal a few weeks ago and Chimideza early on. Could they have helped? Maybe. So too Jahaziel Lee, who hit the portal early on in the season. You start losing guys like that and anybody's depth, anybody not named Alabama or Clemson, is going to feel it.
Guys are going to get get hurt during the year. Everybody is missing guys at this point in the season. Some more than others. Pitt didn't have Weaver and he's a beast.
I think we rotate guys in way too much. Sometimes, you get let em stay out there and play. Because the guy you're bringing in off the bench now may not be the answer. If you think guys like Lockhart and Ivey are going to develop into stalwarts, leave them out there. If you think JaQuon Griffin can make a play (he did with a sack at the end of the first half), leave him out there.
Maybe. I don't think Coach Collins will do what Woody did once. He was recruiting a player in Michigan and ran out of gas mere yards from the Ohio state line. There was a gas station on the Michigan side that was closer but Woody, being Woody, got some guys to push his car across the state line to a gas station in Ohio.Kind of a stretch on both ends though ?
Really?!! This is what kills me.I think we rotate guys in way too much.
The averages you posted earlier are missing context. Pitt beat Austin Peay 55-0. Against FBS teams, they give up 28 ppg, against FBS teams not last in their conference (Syracuse), they give up 30ppg. Admittedly, the latter is cherry picking.Never said folks should be happy. You are mischaracterizing or misinterpreting the context of my posts.
I'm evaluating the offense's performance tonight. I responded to comments about the offense's performance tonight. If you want to have a conversation about the body of work, have at it here with others or in the CDP Offense thread. I'm not engaging around that.
Here are the characterizations of tonight's performance to which I replied:
If folks just want to vent, have at it. Definitely a frustrating game. Was hoping context might help.
- "No offense again hurts us"
- "Coach P got his *** handed to him tonight"
- "And still the D played well enough for us to win"... "his play calling is terrible"
I think I may attend that game. My wife’s family is about an hour from Pitt in Ohio and I like Pittsburgh. Cool townThis will be a game circled on my calendar for next year, no doubt about that
Ok lol. I'm sure that's the case.Really?!! This is what kills me.
Do we still not know this is/was a DEVELOPMENTAL YEAR?
Cmon people. Yes we want to win but we are also prepping for the future. Some personnel mistakes bite us in the *** but we have to play the young guys to get them reps. We also have to play some young guys due to injury and lack of depth but...geesh.
Is next year also a developmental year? Genuinely curious as to when we can expect to be out of the developmental phase and into winning more than we lose.Really?!! This is what kills me.
Do we still not know this is/was a DEVELOPMENTAL YEAR?
Cmon people. Yes we want to win but we are also prepping for the future. Some personnel mistakes bite us in the *** but we have to play the young guys to get them reps. We also have to play some young guys due to injury and lack of depth but...geesh.