If the stories weren’t true and are refuted I’ll take it all back. I’m doubtful that happens.
Few years ago, I don’t remember off hand but a search of the forum will probably give you the answer to when. You can look up grad rate for that year if you want. Matters not to me.
As bad as a factory? If the If happens...pretty much.
Chan didn’t lose me over 7 straight losses to the mutts...though that didn’t help. He lost me when he gave extensive playing time to a recently jailed drug dealer after an idiot judge ruled Tech had to suit him up. Judge couldn’t dictate playing time but Chan used that ruling as an excuse to give extensive pt to a player that should have been off the team. No soup for Chan.
Integrity matters. Or, it should.
You have no direct knowledge yourself, just stories you heard from people behind usernames and recruiting pay wall sites?
Take a small step back and consider that:
1) the pay wall sites have a financial incentive to push anything juicy that is new information, even if it’s hearsay or totally false
2) if Key beat us out to get a recruit, the GT coach that was beaten has a financial incentive to push a negative narrative (I.e. excuse) for why he wasn’t able to reel the recruit in
3) if Key simply pointed to our academic stats, who is to blame for that? Since we don’t have direct knowledge of the incident, let’s play a hypothetical: possibly Key was telling a kid who struggled to make it through high school that he would have a better chance at finishing school at Bama. That’s best for the kid. Key gets points in my book for that.
4) lastly, being “done” with a new regime over an OC hire (or run game coordinator or whatever) is silly. We ALL need to be getting on board with the new vision in hopes of seeing a better program. Being negative from the get go gets us absolutely nowhere.