BigDaddyBuzz
Helluva Engineer
- Messages
- 1,189
Got to love KU telling the ncaa to F off.
The reality is, GT would do well to extend him at salary he's at now, however, decrease the buyout to the point GT pretty much walks away with nothing to pay Pastner. Pastner has ZERO leverage right now. No P5 program will touch him right now, and if he walks, then he walks. He'd be hard press to get a good job at a Non-P5 school as well.
We can appeal but I doubt ncaa modifies it. Hire a really good lawyer on the players behalf to sue for unjust punishment and cease order on current post season ban until the lawyer finishes the case. This is so unfair to the current players! I think they have a solid case, better than uncheats.Maybe I missed something during my travels, but isn't it still a possibility GTAA will appeal the penalties? The post season ban this year is grossly unfair to the seniors on the team and I could not find another example of a team being banned for the current academic year. Also, I thought we self-reported the Bell stuff and our players sat for 4 and 6 games as the penalty.
We may have fewer fans but it won’t be that big of a deal. Our fan base is small compared to bigger schools. It could be small and fervent, but instead it’s small and apathetic.I am going to be really curious to see who is on team Pastner going forward. I understand the issues around firing him now (though I personally think he has hit that threshold), but I also expect that the number of people willing to support him and unfortunately the team is going to go way down. A lot more than this particular team deserves. Somewhere in there is a tradeoff of number of folks still on Team Pastner, cost of moving off of Team Pastner and potential to delete Team Pastner for cause. I hope I am wrong but I expect to see a lot fewer fannies in the seat than what the best team we have had in 5 years would otherwise get.
I’ve attended about 3 GT basketball games in the last 20 years and about the same in baseball. I attend 2-3 times that each year in football. I watch damn near every game on tv that I’m not at. Sorry, but unless business magically matches up with a GT basketball game the chances of me attending are slim to none.We may have fewer fans but it won’t be that big of a deal. Our fan base is small compared to bigger schools. It could be small and fervent, but instead it’s small and apathetic.
I will continue to go to Tech baseball, football and basketball games bc I choose to regardless of record. However, most people who are complaining were not going to attend games even before these sanctions.
As an example, we play a conference football game next weekend and 10% of the people on this board will attend.
We had the number 3 baseball team in the country and auburn matched our fans when we hosted them in the regionals.
I just don’t think it’s going to make a huge difference to the fan attendance since we have so few fans that are willing to go in the first place.
We can appeal but I doubt ncaa modifies it. Hire a really good lawyer on the players behalf to sue for unjust punishment and cease order on current post season ban until the lawyer finishes the case. This is so unfair to the current players! I think they have a solid case, better than uncheats.
I believe our voluntary membership in the NCAA limits our legal avenues for redress. While I agree, I think we have to go through the entire appeals process within the NCAA before we can take them to court.I think a lawsuit outside the NCAA process in Federal court is our best choice. Get them enjoined from imposing the punishment until a full hearing on lack of equal protection (vis a vis the “elites”), arbitrary and caprious penalties, etc. This might tie it up in court for years or prompt a settlement. It has worked for others. It gives Tech some leverage. We need to hire, forgive the reference, a bulldog litigator and get aggressive for a change.
OK, but my understanding is we expect to hear the result of our appeal within 10 days or so. (That tells me it is slip service process.) So, let's get the lawsuit preparation started!I believe our voluntary membership in the NCAA limits our legal avenues for redress. While I agree, I think we have to go through the entire appeals process within the NCAA before we can take them to court.
Maybe but does it limit the players suing? I'd love to see that.I believe our voluntary membership in the NCAA limits our legal avenues for redress. While I agree, I think we have to go through the entire appeals process within the NCAA before we can take them to court.
Pitino,, hmmmAgree with all you said but I'll throw a curveball in that I never thought I'd ever throw (considering I hate the man).
I think the only one crazy enough to take the job right now; discount , sanctions, and all, would be Pitino just to prove a point to the NeverCooperateWithTheseAholes...A.
...the NeverCooperateWithTheseAholes...A.
Doubt it, didn't help Missouri any.I’m hoping that there will be a lot of public condemnation of this ruling in sports and social media, that will embarrass the hell out of the (college sports pretend-governing body).