Civil disobedience has a long and hallowed history in this country. I wonder if any aggrieved school ever disobeyed a waiver denial and played a player anyway. For example, what if Tech ignored the NCAA’s ruling and played Clayton in the Tech-Clemson game after the game was already decided? Suppose that Clemson was up 49 to 7 to start the 4th quarter and Clayton entered the game. If the sanctions were limited only to a “forfeit” of any game in which an ineligible player plays, so what? It would provide an exceptional platform to give national exposure to the arbitrary actions of the NCAA. It’s a nice day to daydream...
I'd like to see this list.There are also athletes at big name schools who were denied waivers.
Link?Sims has been granted immediate eligibility.
Link?
Probably have to do an open records request, but I'm not sure if that can be done with the NCAA since they are not a government organization.Did the N(azi)CAA offer any reason for denying the appeal?
You are texting while driving??? Or is Tapatalk voice-activated?Press release coming shortly. In car or would post more.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
So I guess the precedent is - if you’re transferring from Michigan you get the request, but only on appeal? I’m happy for Sims, but this seems odd. Did the Harbaugh douche factor result in an across the board grant on appeal for ex-Wolverines?
Sadly the NCAA is almighty and doesn't have to explain itselfDid the N(azi)CAA offer any reason for denying the appeal?
One guy was actually moving a great distance closer to home, the other not so much. Just a thoughtWell, that's obviously great news, but why not Clayton also? Makes no sense.