- Messages
- 19,525
In a Lyft, not driving, but also on a call
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
NCAA denies waivers for Clayton, Ezzard; Sims granted immediate eligibility
- Thread starter AlabamaBuzz
- Start date
In a Lyft, not driving, but also on a call
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
DaltonJacket
Jolly Good Fellow
- Messages
- 228
I love what he said but we probably now have to forfeit any wins the next few years for a crime to be determined at some convenient point in the future.
stech81
Helluva Engineer
- Messages
- 8,882
- Location
- Woodstock Georgia
Yes glad he said it
BleedGoldNWhite21
Helluva Engineer
- Messages
- 1,456
What do we actually know about Clayton’s reasoning? Am I just out of the loop or we all just assuming he had a good case because people in the know claim so?
Not trying to defend the NCAA, it just feels like I am completely out of the loop here lol
Not trying to defend the NCAA, it just feels like I am completely out of the loop here lol
- Messages
- 19,525
I’d say Clayton definitely biggest need. Then Sims, then Ezzard.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Supersizethatorder-mutt
Banned
- Messages
- 13,443
- Location
- Augusta, GA
OK. That's good to know.
- Messages
- 8,093
- Location
- Augusta, Georgia
Pro tip: I don't let circumstances dictate my ethics.
MySouthernJacket
Jolly Good Fellow
- Messages
- 238
I don't believe for a second that one of you has the means and networking to find a lawyer that can fight this for Clayton. That is ridiculous!
- Messages
- 8,093
- Location
- Augusta, Georgia
I am not inclined to disagree with you on this. That still doesn't prove conspiracy on the part of the NCAA that he didn't get one.
- Messages
- 4,861
- Messages
- 8,093
- Location
- Augusta, Georgia
While it would be nice if one of our boosters funded the lawyer for Clayton, I'm almost certain that that would land us in hot water with the NCAA on it's own merits...
Supersizethatorder-mutt
Banned
- Messages
- 13,443
- Location
- Augusta, GA
Inconsistency may not constitute a conspiracy, but it sure does constitute incompetence.
MySouthernJacket
Jolly Good Fellow
- Messages
- 238
Why does it have to be a booster, why not just a graduate or fan?
smokey_wasp
Helluva Engineer
- Messages
- 5,486
sorry, you're a solid poster but that gets an eye roll from me. My ethics say don't defend an unfair process, but you do you.
smokey_wasp
Helluva Engineer
- Messages
- 5,486
I never said there was a conspiracy, just that they got it wrong.
- Messages
- 8,093
- Location
- Augusta, Georgia
I've yet to see inconsistency proven. Whenever there are exemptions to rules allowed, there is a certain level of "inconsistency" inherent in the process. If ONLY the major schools got the exceptions, there would be an argument. There is proof of exceptions at schools across the FBS landscape and proof of denials at major schools. MOST of the exceptions we discuss are blatantly obvious why they were exempted and a few might never be known due to privacy act, HIPAA, and other legal reasons.
- Messages
- 8,093
- Location
- Augusta, Georgia
I've yet to see where the process is unfair.
AlabamaBuzz
Helluva Engineer
- Messages
- 4,017
- Location
- Hartselle, AL (originally Rome, GA)
We cannot offend the mighty SEC - Clayton transferred from UF - just sickens me.
- Messages
- 8,093
- Location
- Augusta, Georgia
Anyone who shells out money to/for the betterment of a student athlete will be defined by the NCAA as a booster.
smokey_wasp
Helluva Engineer
- Messages
- 5,486
Agree to disagree. I will be on Coach's side. He clearly believes it was.