I think TO should start until he demonstrates he is not getting the job done. I think the team responds to him better.
Go Jackets!
If we are benching long time starters in ol who grade out at top of team in blocking- bryan, what's so great about the tqm . His reads against Duke were not good.
Both he and lee got almost NO minutes in a beat down of vt. . At VT How much pass blocking, trap blocking ( 1 pull block by hansen fell down when cutting up field, hansen only drove block the whole game - he did very good at this one thing) did we do AS WE RAN 2 plays. It was insulting to lee and Bryan who got very very little time for no meaningful benefit.
FACT : Duke front 7 was 50 / 50 under class / upper class with part time DC (d l coach and db coach shared duty). VT - 80/20 under verses upper w good DC.
At VT we had young guys and so did they.
UNC 20/80 under verses upper class men and a new DC.
Compared to VT , UNC has by far the most defenders and has a DC of whom we have little info.
This would scream the need for experience in both QB AND OL . Look for multiple fronts and schemes that make calls difficult.
To win at UNC I would go w experience at both qb and ol AND have planned young guy rotation.
On the other hand if u play the expierenced guys and get an L, this tells me that the system has serious limits .
So back to Jerry's point="To show me the offense scheme can be taught , play the young guys and win at least 2 of last 4.
Otherwise, I am in the boat the scheme has too many moving parts; its time for the Ramblin Wrek to get a new engine.