ATL1
Helluva Engineer
- Messages
- 7,377
The NRA is a pretty diverse group from what I’ve seen. But more whites own firearms than other demographics so there will logically be more white members in the NRA as well. I don’t have any exact stats just my own interactions and first hand knowledge.
The trouble comes in so called “common sense” regulations. AR15s are common sense firearms according the the vast majority of people who favor protecting the 2nd amendment...exact opposite of those who wish to limit 2A.
I really don’t care if gun grabbers think the NRA appears “brutish or unsympathetic” to those who wish to abolish my civil rights.
The Castile shooting was abhorrent. The NRA did not “immediately” condemn the officer involved. The NRA has a track record of not castigating law enforcement in “bad shoots.” True before the Castile incident and true after it. And race doesn’t play a part in that imo. The NRA has also been “silent” when other demographics are involved in similar incidents.
The NRA is in fact a “grass roots” organization. And after the Castile incident it’s own members criticized their own organization on its Facebook page in the immediate days following the incident.
ON July 8 2016 the NRA podcast hist Cam Edwards stared “What we know does not look good. Our right to keep and bear arms is not based on the color of our skin.”
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...ner-Philando-Castile-accused-racial-bias.html
Let me reiterate that the NRA does not condemn law enforcement generally. Anti NRA forces utilized the Castile shooting to call on the NRA to condemn the police immediatel. When a statement wasn’t made immediately, anti NRA media attempted to portray this “silence” as evidence of racism in the organization.
For the record Castile was slain (unjustly imo) July 6th. The NRA “statement” in their podcast was made July 7.
So it’s fair to criticize the MRA for being too pro-police. But imo it’s a bit unfair to claim it is racist.
I’ll disagree with you on the racial component. I firmly believe it plays a part.
Personally I wouknt ban an AR 15. I would just make it more of a process to buy and easier to track ownership. Also owners should some mental check up when own an Arsenal of weapons.
I get the bad *** make you feel good aspects of owning a gun. An AR 15 especially, but there is no real practical purpose for it. So let me ask, what’s the fear?
You mention the typical buzz words.
Illegals
Islamic terrorist
Criminals
ect.
All of which is highly unlikely. I mean extremely unlikely any of these being performed by one of these groups in the US.
https://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2017/01/trump-immigration-ban-terrorism/514361/
It is more likely to happen within the pro NRA militia man set.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.vo...96612/las-vegas-mass-shooting-terrorism-islam
These uneven ideals definitely shows an ethnic/racial bias. The fear mongering used to loosen gun laws in GA. Out of the millions of people riding MARTA how many have actually been shot ON the train? Yet, Jawja legislators passed a law allowing guns on MARTA as a source of protection. Funny people and thier constituents who barely ride MARTA is ever making a law like that. Why?
Similar fear sprung up in Black communities almost entire based on Trump and his white supremacy supporters.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.nbcnews.com/news/amp/ncna758211
Anyway gun laws aren’t changing in this country. Too many “on my cold dying hands” types. Most people don’t care about children enough to actually relinquish the ability to have easy access to weapons. So we’ll just have to wait for the next mass shooting.