WreckinGT
Helluva Engineer
- Messages
- 3,216
Oh give me a break. Here is what she said again:Stop lying.
Think about it. The day of and the day after the shooting, people reported that the officer did not come into contact with the shooting. Why they said that, I don't know. Could be the officer was embarrassed he was not there. There was an off-duty officer there for a different reason (unarmed) who ran around and tried to help the victims, and he never saw the shooter I believe. could be confusion with his story, I don't know. But FIVE DAYS later is the official statement from this lady.
I'm not calling anybody a liar, I'm saying that the information they had at the time was incorrect. This lady was pretty definitive in her statement. What someone had said 5 days earlier as you quoted is exactly the point I was trying to make. That information has since been corrected.
I do find it odd that there has not been an official statement from the officer or law enforcement. I can only trust that to mean they are trying to hide or embarrassed or avoid lawsuits.
"I have been told by a couple of sources that the SRO was either called off campus responding to something happening or it could have been his day off,” she said. “They are stretched very thin."
She doesn't know if he was there, or if he wasn't there, why he wasn't there. There is nothing definitive about that statement at all and she isn't in a position to know anyways. She is just regurgitating what she had heard from someone unknown. The only definitive statements have been made were by the Sheriff and BSO officials who both said flat out that he was there. You think they are lying.