I understand your point, but disagree (just not a huge disagreement). It isn't like Satterfield worked miracles...he didn't. But, the last three years were 4 wins, 6 wins, and 7 wins. And they beat N C State and Wake Forest (as well as Pitt) this past season.
Petrino (besides being a jerk) had Lamar Jackson to work with. And NEVER won more than 9 games with him on the field. He also had allowed the team to degrade to the point they were giving up 50 points or more in 4 straight games when they cut ties with Petrino. Heck, even GT embarrassed them under CPJ scoring 66 on them.
So, agree that Satterfield is not a world beater, but disagree about him being terrible (which is how I read your posts).
I never said he was terrible, he was just ‘OK’. My biggest argument is that he didn’t “elevate” Louisville’s program at all, which is what you originally said. If Petrino won 9 games there, Satterfield would’ve had to have win 9 more times than Petrino, or get to 10 wins at some point. He did neither, and he never even won 9 games. He also went winless against Kentucky, who Petrino went 3-2 against.
I just see no scenario or support to say that Satterfield elevated Louisville’s program to heights it’s never been before, or even been to in recent memory. His
best season was about on par for what Petrino did there for 5 years, and close to what Louisville has averaged since 2000, even if the bulk of that was against lesser competition. Plus, the biggest dagger against Satterfield at UofL is that he lost to Geoff Collins. Hard to argue someone is a good coach when that happens.