I watched it.
They handed us the ball game and, while we did take them up on it, we didn't play well enough on D - again - to really benefit from it. Any team that losses 3 fumbles in a game ought to lose. It's to our credit that we scored off of two of the turnovers. It's to theirs that they came back and won, albeit barely. Again, untimely penalties didn't do us any good at all and this in a game where the refs were not calling the close ones.
The O - again - was only sporadically effective. Why? Because, imho, we aren't putting our best players on the field for every play. If we concentrated on giving Mason the ball 15- 20 times a game we would benefit. If we had Gibbs on the field at the same time and concentrated on getting him the ball 15 - 20 times as well we would also benefit. I'm at a loss to say why this isn't happening; it's not as if we don't have adequate backups. Btw, I didn't think Sims played badly today; not great, of course, but not badly. He made several good throws and only got intercepted once. Oth, he didn't lead us to victory either. Still a work in progress, given that the coaches don't let him run.
As for there D - well, the numbers speak for themselves, despite the stops on 4th down. (Btw, I can see why the Cane fans want to fire Manny after those calls. "We didn't get a first on 4th by running the ball up the middle last time. Let's do it again!!") But … at least they didn't let the game run away from them, which could easily have happened. And we did recover the fumbles when we got the chance. The story here isn't encouraging, but it isn't all bad either.
Like the Clemson game, this is one we could have won and, if the team had anything like a killer instinct, we would have. Unfortunately …