Then a neutral site game starts to make sense but when the starting point is 2 away games and a neutral site where you get the smaller allotment it no longer makes sense. From a financial standpoint we would be better with you, loserville, or a boise state at home sell out crowd.
No my point is that Playoff caliber programs, typically have at least one other playoff caliber person in there schedule
Here is the issue. We had you/maryland on the schedule 2017 and UNC/PITT on the schedule in 2018. stanford/Texas was supposed to be 2019. When we scheduled those games in 2010ish you, pitt, maryland were all way better teams. Its blind luck who will be good 10 years later. Texas straight up just paid us to go away because they could.
Uhh not really man. We charge students "athletic fees" and when you have 60k+ students thats serious money in order to try and compensate but its rough. 2019 ACC had a $153m tv rights deal, AAC had $20m....
Its the precedent it would set as well. Somebody pointed at USF as an example of what we "should be doing". We said no 2 for 1s they said we will take anything. They scheduled a 2 for 1 with Loserville and literally a week later we announced a 1 for 1. Our only real avenue for longterm success is to schedule middle of the pack P5 teams that have a chance to maybe be really good when the game is finally played as well as have top members of our conference such as Memphis, Cinci, maybe Houston continue to improve.
LOL amen, sorry this got hijacked. Great conversation guys! I would take the over on the spread
Don't I recall losing to Temple a year ago? Aren't they an AAC team? Just sayin'.....I'm not sure we are in apposition to be dumping on the AAC Champs just yet....Maybe but last time I checked ACC teams actually play defense. Can’t say the same for the AACbud. Not to mention ur a UCF fan in a GT forum so let’s not claim “unbiased”
The over @ 59.5 or you would take UCF @ -7.5?LOL amen, sorry this got hijacked. Great conversation guys! I would take the over on the spread
The fact you are using last years tech team as an example makes me question how close you monitor the coaching on our team
Sorry I just made a random betting statement for the laugh.
he outgrew those last week in the second half.
lol now thats a true fan
Yet, this is why our 2020/2021 games with Alabama were canceled. We had a deal with them and then they tried to force us to have our "Home" game in the Georgia Dome instead of at HGF@BDS. We told them to go pound sand. We've since rescheduled, but Alabama looks at us as a potential bad risk, with no upside in coming to BDS.
I really don't understand what's happening on VegasInsider vs. other sites.
Every sportsbook on VegasInsider has GT opening as a 4 point favorite, now down to 2.5 to 3 point favorites: https://www.vegasinsider.com/[email protected]/date/09-18-20
Every other site shows GT as 7 to 8 point underdogs. Ex:
UCF Knights vs Georgia Tech Yellow Jackets
UCF Knights vs Georgia Tech Yellow Jackets Odds - Saturday September 19 2020. Live betting odds and lines, betting trends, against the spread and over/under trends, injury reports and matchup stats for bettors.www.oddsshark.com
DraftKings Network
All the latest DFS, fantasy, and sports betting news, analysis, and strategy for NFL, NBA, MLB, NHL, and NCAAdknation.draftkings.com
UCF Knights vs. Georgia Tech Yellow Jackets Odds, Betting Lines, Expert picks, Game Projections, DFS Projections and Player Prop Projections - Saturday 09/19 19:30 PM - SportsLine.com
Picks, odds, and game forecast for Knights at Yellow Jackets on Saturday 09/19 19:30 PM in Yellow Jacketswww.sportsline.com
It's not a timing issue. It's also not an issue where VegasInsider just reversed the spread incorrectly. Anyone figure out the reason for the variance? Seems to me VegasInsider is wrong.