There is an article dictating what a friend of the person shot said about him and the incident. A lot of this story reminds me that young people(and a lot of older people too) are far too idealistic in how they view force, reaction to force, and self defense. A person that I went to high school with was pulled over by a policeman when he was in college. It was nighttime. He got out of his car and walked toward the police car. He reached behind to pull out his wallet. The policeman yelled at him, and when he looked up the policeman had his gun drawn and pointed at him. When he told me the story, he said that the policeman shouldn't have pulled his gun until he saw a weapon and was certain that he was in danger. I told him that he was lucky to be alive and that if an officer waits until he sees the gun being presented to pull his gun out that he wouldn't have enough time to react.
https://www.yahoo.com/lifestyle/fri...ut-gender-conforming-different-191136296.html
That may be one of the dumbest interviews I've ever read.
First of all, she (Scout's friend) complains the cops were just yelling to put down the weapon instead of playing psychologist and asking what's wrong. If someone can't understand basic commands to stop advancing towards cops and to put down a weapon, do you really think they're going to engage in a psychological treatment session? Furthermore, if you watch the video, the cops actually DID ask questions like that, saying "We don't want to hurt you." and "Alright, what are we doing here, what's going on." So her assumptions are silly, and they are incorrect based on the evidence.
Second, she wonders whether something would have been different had he not been trans. At one point she wonders out loud as to if he was specifically targeted for being the President of the local LGBTQ group. I guarantee you that none of the cops there that night knew he was not gender conforming, nor would they have cared. Furthermore, she talks about how weak and frail he is like he couldn't have possibly been a scary or threatening adversary. Well, it doesn't take much strength to pull a trigger or stab a knife, so that's an illogical position on that point. Furthermore, she implies normal guys are much more strong and fit - so how exactly would that have supported her argument that a more strong and fit person would have been less likely to get shot? It makes no sense.
Finally, the article refers to him as being intersex (implying he was born with characteristics of both genders). I just wonder why the parents, upon his birth, didn't have surgery for him while it was easiest and assign him a gender (either one, whichever was easiest). Leaving him with both is like making him a third world science experiment. I just simply cannot imagine how hard his life has been because of that and how much angst and pressure and uncomfortable situations and thoughts he's had over his life because of those decisions his parents made early on.