Good discussion about how the NCAA seeding compare to RPI over recent years. Bottom line, at 18 RPI this morning we are good shape to host if we finish string and get it up just a bit.
Ironically, I think the premise can be turned around. What D1 does is start from the premise that their rankings are right and the RPI is wrong. But the committee more seems to take the opposing view, the RPIs are right unless proven wrong.
Once again, I am glad I don't have to do rankings as someone is always legitimately pissed and I'm glad my job doesn't rely on the performance of 18 to 22 year old college athletes.
Mark dives into the odd disconnects between the polls and the RPI. What does history tell us, and what will (or should) the committee do?
d1baseball.com