Coronavirus Thread

[Vespidae]

It’s crazy to me that Georgia is still as open as it is without mask requirements

I’m delighted with Georgia’s policy. I manufactured the PPE and the level of misunderstanding is just out of control.

To control a virus, you have to control the viral load and the time. In low viral threshold environments, masks aren’t necessary unless you are in them for a long period of time. So, shopping at Publix is safe for consumers but, workers should wear masks.

You can use ventilation to control viral load, so turn the air faster or ... increase the dilution effect (open windows, sit on the patio, etc).

Masks are required for face-to-face contact over extended periods of time. If you’re in an environment with low viral load or one that doesn’t require a lot of face to face contact, masks aren’t necessary. I don’t wear one and I know the risks. I avoid them but ... use your head! Inside or Outside? Many people or few? More than 15 min or less?

I see people walking their dog alone wearing a mask. Totally unnecessary.

 

[GT_EE78]

>is a bad expert better than no expert?
Dr. Fauci: ‘We Don’t Know’ How Less Likely People Are to Transmit Coronavirus When Wearing a Mask
Dr. Anthony Fauci, of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, suggested in an interview with MarketWatch on Friday that young people are “becoming part of the problem” in the outbreak of the Chinese coronavirus and admitted that experts “don’t know exactly” to what extent people are less likely to transmit the coronavirus when they are wearing a mask.

Dr. Fauci: Young People 'Part of the Problem' in Coronavirus Outbreak

Dr. Anthony Fauci said experts "don't know exactly" to what extent people are less likely to transmit the coronavirus when wearing a mask.

www.breitbart.com

 

[bobongo]

Well I’m sorry I hurt your feelings. I think at this point your best choice of recourse is to report me.

Wrong yet again. You could not possibly hurt my feelings. I'm just correcting what you pointedly and obtusely got wrong. Again.

 

[Deleted member 2897]

Wrong yet again. You could not possibly hurt my feelings. I'm just correcting what you pointedly and obtusely got wrong. Again.

Your emotional language and tantrums say otherwise. More importantly, you’re not arguing the substance, but rather who actually said it. I mean, LOL.

 

[bobongo]

Your emotional language and tantrums say otherwise. More importantly, you’re not arguing the substance, but rather who actually said it. I mean, LOL.

Blah, blah, blah. More false attributions. Every time you misrepresent what I say, I will call you out on it. LOL.

 

[Deleted member 2897]

Blah, blah, blah. More false attributions. Every time you misrepresent what I say, I will call you out on it. LOL.

Well so you didn’t say it, and you didn’t not say it. So at least I’ve finally figured that part out.

 

[bobongo]

Well so you didn’t say it, and you didn’t not say it. So at least I’ve finally figured that part out.

You haven't figured anything out.

 

[Deleted member 2897]

You haven't figured anything out.

So if you didn’t say it, and you didn’t not say it, that must mean your beef is that it wasn’t not about what you didn’t say, but the real point was that someone else said it and you weren’t not taking sides and I erroneously accused you of saying what you didn’t but someone else did.

 

[bobongo]

So if you didn’t say it, and you didn’t not say it, that must mean your beef is that it wasn’t not about what you didn’t say, but the real point was that someone else said it and you weren’t not taking sides and I erroneously accused you of saying what you didn’t but someone else did.

"Yadda, yadda, yadda...". You've twisted yourself into a knot, there.

But I'll graciously let you have the last word. If I don't, it'll never end.

 

[Deleted member 2897]

"Yadda, yadda, yadda...". You've twisted yourself into a knot, there.

But I'll graciously let you have the last word. If I don't, it'll never end.

Ya think? Finally catching on? Let’s take this valid discussion through the entire weekend! It will be great!

 

[Deleted member 2897]

Dr. Fauci was pictured laughing at a baseball game not wearing his mask. On the news today, he called the picture and commentary “mischievous”. LOLOLOL. I mean, IIWII. The pictures and video are there for all to see.

I don’t recall the mask recommendations being void if you recently tested negative or are around friends.

 

[Deleted member 2897]

The Supreme Court today ruled without restrictions that movies and casinos in Nevada could operate freely during this pandemic, but restricted churches. Maybe churches should call themselves a religious movie theater and just broadcast recorded sermons? Or maybe they should break out craps tables and gamble on the odds of getting into heaven? I can’t remember any amendment that grants us rights to watch movies or gamble. I can’t figure out what seditious drugs some of these people are taking. This virus is making people lose their minds. There is no logical or scientific or epidemiological or legal reasoning that would make sense to me on this. If anybody has any idea, I’d be interested to hear what I might be missing.

 

[RonJohn]

The Supreme Court today ruled without restrictions that movies and casinos in Nevada could operate freely during this pandemic, but restricted churches. Maybe churches should call themselves a religious movie theater and just broadcast recorded sermons? Or maybe they should break out craps tables and gamble on the odds of getting into heaven? I can’t remember any amendment that grants us rights to watch movies or gamble. I can’t figure out what seditious drugs some of these people are taking. This virus is making people lose their minds. There is no logical or scientific or epidemiological or legal reasoning that would make sense to me on this. If anybody has any idea, I’d be interested to hear what I might be missing.

Did the Supreme Court actually make a ruling? or did they fail to provide injunctive relief during a court trial?

 

[Deleted member 2897]

Did the Supreme Court actually make a ruling? or did they fail to provide injunctive relief during a court trial?

Well, they released their ruling on a Friday night and refused to explain why. LOL. Here is a good summary:

The Supreme Court’s surprising decision on churches and the pandemic, explained

Nevada churches brought an unusually strong challenge to the state’s public health rules, but they lost anyway.

www.vox.com

Its a pretty bad sign when you can't even officially explain yourself.

 

[Vespidae]

The Supreme Court today ruled without restrictions that movies and casinos in Nevada could operate freely during this pandemic, but restricted churches. Maybe churches should call themselves a religious movie theater and just broadcast recorded sermons? Or maybe they should break out craps tables and gamble on the odds of getting into heaven? I can’t remember any amendment that grants us rights to watch movies or gamble. I can’t figure out what seditious drugs some of these people are taking. This virus is making people lose their minds. There is no logical or scientific or epidemiological or legal reasoning that would make sense to me on this. If anybody has any idea, I’d be interested to hear what I might be missing.

Religion has no place in the New Republic. Roberts is leading the charge. He’s all in on the opiate of the masses.

 

[RonJohn]

Well, they released their ruling on a Friday night and refused to explain why. LOL. Here is a good summary:

The Supreme Court’s surprising decision on churches and the pandemic, explained

Nevada churches brought an unusually strong challenge to the state’s public health rules, but they lost anyway.

www.vox.com

Its a pretty bad sign when you can't even officially explain yourself.

Because it isn't a case ruling. It is a ruling that they are not providing an injunction before a case is heard. They haven't heard a case about this. The appeals court hasn't heard a case about this. A trial court hasn't even heard a case about this.

 

[Deleted member 2897]

Because it isn't a case ruling. It is a ruling that they are not providing an injunction before a case is heard. They haven't heard a case about this. The appeals court hasn't heard a case about this. A trial court hasn't even heard a case about this.

The dissenters wrote an opinion. That’s not a valid excuse. None of that is a valid reason to ignore the Constitution. When a case reaches them, they should always follow the law. Several of them did.

 

[Milwaukee]

 

[RonJohn]

The dissenters wrote an opinion. That’s not a valid excuse. None of that is a valid reason to ignore the Constitution. When a case reaches them, they should always follow the law. Several of them did.

The case had not reached them. The case hasn't even been conducted in a trial court yet.

 

[herb]

The case had not reached them. The case hasn't even been conducted in a trial court yet.

the case had reached them. They issued an order on the church‘s motion for injunctive relief. there is more than one way to get to the Supreme Court.