>> Why do you think WaPo and MSNBC deliberately deceived the public in Feb by omitting that a microbiologist had said that this Chinese Virus may have leaked from the Wuhan bioweapons lab?
"Ebright, the Rutgers University molecular biologist, told Beijing-based news outlet Caixin Global in February that while there is “no basis to suspect the virus was engineered,” the available data indicates that the virus’s introduction into human populations could be attributed to either natural causes or to a laboratory mishap.The Washington Post and MSNBC have quoted Ebright saying that theories about the virus being a bioweapon should be “firmly excluded,” but neither outlet included his belief that the possibility that the virus entered the human population through a lab accident “cannot–and should not–be dismissed.”
.
The SARS virus escaped twice from the Chinese Institute of Virology in Beijing in 2004, one year after the virus was initially contained.
Another Chinese doctor, Ai Fen, claimed she was silenced by her bosses when she tried to warn about the virus during its early stages. Ai’s whereabouts as of Sunday are currently unknown, according to 60 Minutes Australia, sparking fears that she has been detained.
two Chinese researchers noted in a separate paper in February that the horseshoe bats that are known to carry the nearly-identical viral strain live 600 miles away from Wuhan. The researchers also cited testimonies from nearly 60 people who lived in or visited Wuhan saying that the bat “was never a food source in the city, and no bat was traded in the market.”“The killer coronavirus probably originated from a laboratory in Wuhan,” the two Chinese researchers noted in their paper, which was uploaded to Research Gate on Feb. 6.
Sen. Tom Cotton of Arkansas told the DCNF on Wednesday it is wholly appropriate to question whether the coronavirus outbreak originated from labs in Wuhan that were studying coronaviruses.After concealing the virus for many weeks in December and then minimizing its severity for most of January, they then peddle an origin story about the food market in Wuhan.” “Given their dishonesty and the proximity of these labs, which we know were working with coronaviruses, it is only reasonable and responsible for us to ask the question and demand the answers.”
https://dailycaller.com/2020/04/02/...stitute-virology-richard-ebright-shi-zhengli/
The possibility that it "escaped" by accident because of a lab mishap is a conspiracy theory? First the left and the media says that saying it came from the wet market in Wuhan was racist, and now they say a lab accident is a conspiracy. So where DID it come from?Sorry, as of right now this is nothing more than a conspiracy theory with no real basis in fact. in your very first quoted sentence
there is “no basis to suspect the virus was engineered,”
The possibility that it "escaped" by accident because of a lab mishap is a conspiracy theory? First the left and the media says that saying it came from the wet market in Wuhan was racist, and now they say a lab accident is a conspiracy. So where DID it come from?
I have never said that it was any kind of conspiracy at all. Yes, viruses like this one have been around forever, and yes, that is life. But that doctor's OPINION about it coming from birds is apparently just that...an OPINION. There are other valid opinions as well, but again, I don't consider any kind of bio-weapon opinion as plausible. However, it IS plausible that in doing research on viruses in a test lab, something went wrong, and it ended up accidentally being released to the public. The problem in this case is that the Chinese have not been forthcoming at all in providing any real information about the virus, either its source or its effects within China.I explained that days ago - from a dcotor,
The Coronavirus' are all virus' that start in birds. At some point this virus mutated from a bird into another animal. From there it mutated in November where it went from an animal to a human. Then it mutated where it could be transferred from human to human and that is where we are today.
We don't need to be looking for evil conspiracy theories for everything just to make us feel better. these virus' have been around for centuries. Sometimes they are more aggressive and easily transferable sometimes not - in this case we have probably the most transferable virus in 100 years.
Not everything is about someone out to get you. Sometimes things just happen because that is life.
I explained that days ago - from a dcotor,
The Coronavirus' are all virus' that start in birds. At some point this virus mutated from a bird into another animal. From there it mutated in November where it went from an animal to a human. Then it mutated where it could be transferred from human to human and that is where we are today.
We don't need to be looking for evil conspiracy theories for everything just to make us feel better. these virus' have been around for centuries. Sometimes they are more aggressive and easily transferable sometimes not - in this case we have probably the most transferable virus in 100 years.
Not everything is about someone out to get you. Sometimes things just happen because that is life.
Daily update, Spain and Italy both had another terrible ~800 daily deaths, which have been more or less consistent. One of the things Milwaukee harped on was that this exponential curve physically cannot continue. So in that regard, you may read some articles that the growth rate of infections is starting to slow. To me in my personal opinion, its nothing to write home about. The exponential curve hasn't continued, but the slope of the line is still very steep. If you compare them for example to South Korea, they're not even on the same planet. Spain for example, had 8,000 new cases yesterday. Thats a US-population equivalent of 55,000 cases in a single day. That will still equate to another 500-1000 deaths 2-3 weeks from now at the mortality rate they've been running. This data to me in my personal opinion is still disheartening, because they've been in a lockdown/stay-at-home (as far as I can remember) for quite a long time now.
I take the numbers as even if you practice strict social distancing, at least in the short term the best outcome is leveling of the curve, not even bending it back downward. So the question that Spain and Italy will likely help answer is once you start mitigation how long until you can start to level off the curve and how much longer from then do you need to actually get it to start heading back down. it's pretty clear that a best case scenario for trying to get to a peak takes about 3 weeks. I think we are likely to find based on what we are seeing so far that it will take at least that long again to start to get it to decline.
If you take those as baselines we should start to see a leveling of death rates around 2-3 weeks from now. And then hopefully by early May we start to see some downward movement. if that goes well then maybe by the end of May we can start to lossen the mitigation measures some.
No disagreement there, but, you should add ... until and if it reappears again later in the year. That is a question that nobody will be able to answer for some time yet.I take the numbers as even if you practice strict social distancing, at least in the short term the best outcome is leveling of the curve, not even bending it back downward. So the question that Spain and Italy will likely help answer is once you start mitigation how long until you can start to level off the curve and how much longer from then do you need to actually get it to start heading back down. it's pretty clear that a best case scenario for trying to get to a peak takes about 3 weeks. I think we are likely to find based on what we are seeing so far that it will take at least that long again to start to get it to decline.
If you take those as baselines we should start to see a leveling of death rates around 2-3 weeks from now. And then hopefully by early May we start to see some downward movement. if that goes well then maybe by the end of May we can start to lossen the mitigation measures some.
Unless it is confirmed by other doctors, then it is an opinion. HAS it been confirmed by others?I don't think the doctor's story is an opinion. it is a fact.
I think the story of it being made up in a lab is an opinion with no basis in fact.
Try not to confuse an opinion with a fact.
No...N-95 masks vs home grown masks.....sorry I did not make that point clear....didn't you wonder why the virus treating hospital workers were told to wear them?
You clearly missed the point. No one suggested that it was engineered. but the evidence is substantial that it may have leaked from the virology lab.Sorry, as of right now this is nothing more than a conspiracy theory with no real basis in fact. in your very first quoted sentence
there is “no basis to suspect the virus was engineered,”