IEEEWreck
Ramblin' Wreck
- Messages
- 656
I've seen some anecdotal evidence.Is this true? Have you seen the checks or receipts? I hope it’s true but haven’t seen anything indicating it is.
I've seen some anecdotal evidence.Is this true? Have you seen the checks or receipts? I hope it’s true but haven’t seen anything indicating it is.
I am not saying he withheld $ long ago or recently.
But it would seem more likely he may not be answering the phone recently because he is EMBARRASSED about gt getting slaughtered for last 2 years by uga and clemson.
Top dogs are not used to getting whipped.
2015 - ugh
2016
With Mills
Mills a true freshman who started day one, ran game 1 winning td on final drive, destroyed kentucky in gator bowl and was mvp as a true freshman.
Only once in a while did we get a mills, a jt , a bebe, etc. Then we were back to 2017/18.
Dont know what the future holds if we get fewer top players due to inherent difficulties.
I'm not that close although I know someone that played cards with PJ (back when the Brock facility was being built) because a mutual friend of ours thought he was a big-timer. He soon learned otherwise.Is this true? Have you seen the checks or receipts? I hope it’s true but haven’t seen anything indicating it is.
...
Personally, I find it very hard to believe that "big donors" had it in for Paul. Why would they, if they were real Tech fans? But I admit that it is almost impossible to prove or disprove urban legends like this. If it suits some narratives here, it'll live on no matter what the actual story is.
...
I'm not that close although I know someone that played cards with PJ (back when the Brock facility was being built) because a mutual friend of ours thought he was a big-timer. He soon learned otherwise.
But it stands absolute reason that if more money is being spent it's coming from somewhere and my money is on that it came from the real big donors who now want to spend it. What that reason is? I think we've all heard rumors that are probably true as to why they've now written checks or made commitments.
Which makes the entire scenario harder to believe for me. Unless they were real, real impatient. That could be true, I suppose, and people with money can be very capricious indeed.If so I’m glad they finally got their way. It only took 11 years to get it.
.If so I’m glad they finally got their way. It only took 11 years to get it.
Or maybe they decided it was time to spend more than they were before. That's also a possibility. IDK.If so I’m glad they finally got their way. It only took 11 years to get it.
I've seen some anecdotal evidence.
All these references to “narrative”—I’m think of making a drinking game out of it...Most likely it's very wrong. Our biggest donors never quit giving. A couple of them were known to socialize with CPJ. There is a large group of fans, however, who insist on driving an anti-CPJ narrative, even after he retired. That's where most of this came from...
You’ll never make it through the night and you will regret it tomorrowAll these references to “narrative”—I’m think of making a drinking game out of it...
@BurdellJacket
There is some truth to this. A couple of donors came back to the table after CPJ announced his retirement. They weren't our biggest donors, but they are big donors. Interestingly, my source says they quit donating shortly after CPJ was hired, so it's not like they were being counted on for the CGC hire, but it's definitely helpful to have them back. The money is available now because of a few reasons:
1. Hewitt and other highly paid former coaches are finally coming off the books.
2. The 2020 initiative has excited the donors, and a lot of smaller donors have stepped up their game.
3. The major donors, who never quit giving, are giving more to help CGC get off on a firm footing.
In essence, we REALLY need to be thankful that we hired TStan. He gets it, and it is showing.
I'm confused. Or are you saying that happened with some big donors, but not the biggest donors. The biggest donors have just started giving more?Most likely it's very wrong. Our biggest donors never quit giving. A couple of them were known to socialize with CPJ. There is a large group of fans, however, who insist on driving an anti-CPJ narrative, even after he retired. That's where most of this came from...
You probably don’t get the joke...but I’m sure one person out there does...You’ll never make it through the night and you will regret it tomorrow
Add in roll eyes, eye rolls and I will play. First we have to get permision from animal.All these references to “narrative”—I’m think of making a drinking game out of it...
Add in roll eyes, eye rolls and I will play. First we have to get permision from animal.
Animal has nominated the barf prize.
I'm confused. Or are you saying that happened with some big donors, but not the biggest donors. The biggest donors have just started giving more?
Definitely does. Falls in line with a lot of what I've heard (outside msg boards). Thanks.Hopefully this clears up the mud a bit.
So, to sum this up TStan has been working to raise more revenue. A goodly portion of this revenue was already committed prior to CPJs announcement. Additional revenue came in because of CPJs announcement for two distinct reasons: 1, a few donors who were less than thrilled with CPJ came back to the table, and 2, regular donors gave more to help secure the best coach and staff possible.