Coastal Chaos

TheSilasSonRising

Helluva Engineer
Messages
3,729
The way Miami was just shuffling around with no sense of urgency with about one minute to go was unbelievable.

Really looks like some motivational or inspirational problems on that team.

It will expose itself next week in a big way I think - don’t know which way.

It was tough because I did not mind watching um lose and I did not like watching duke win.
 
GT_05

GT_05

Helluva Engineer
Messages
2,370
Lots of sloppy football from the ACC Coastal teams this weekend. Who looked good? Pitt and Duke? Strange times.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
tech_wreck47

tech_wreck47

Helluva Engineer
Messages
8,670
boger2337 said:
So with a Duke win in Miami, are we out of the coastal???
Click to expand...
Nope, that just would have helped. There are multiple ways to still make it.

Option 1:

GT wins out
VT losses to Miami
UVA losses to GT
Pitt losses 2 of either Miami, WF, VT (all 3 takes them completely out)
Duke losses to Clemson
This would give us a tie with VT, UVA, and Pitt (unless Pitt loses all 3)

Option 2 (everything stays the same but)
VT losses to UVA
UVA losses to GT and VT
This leaves a tie with GT, VT, and Pitt (unless Pitt loses all 3)

Option 3 (everything stays the same but)
VT losses to UVA and Miami
UVA losses to GT
This leaves a tie with GT, UVA, and Pitt (unless Pitt loses all 3)

If Pitt is involved in any of the ties idk how the winner would be determined in a 3 way tie or more. If Pitt losses all 3 and any of these three options happen we win the Costal. Miami winning just would have helped with the tie situation if Pitt lost 2 and finished with the same record, but it wasn’t a make it or brake it thing. This also assumes Duke losses to Clemson but if they somehow pulled it off they would still need to beat WF and UNC.
 

Animal02

Banned
Messages
6,269
Location
Southeastern Michigan
tech_wreck47 said:
Nope, that just would have helped. There are multiple ways to still make it.

Option 1:

GT wins out
VT losses to Miami
UVA losses to GT
Pitt losses 2 of either Miami, WF, VT (all 3 takes them completely out)
Duke losses to Clemson
This would give us a tie with VT, UVA, and Pitt (unless Pitt loses all 3)

Option 2 (everything stays the same but)
VT losses to UVA
UVA losses to GT and VT
This leaves a tie with GT, VT, and Pitt (unless Pitt loses all 3)

Option 3 (everything stays the same but)
VT losses to UVA and Miami
UVA losses to GT
This leaves a tie with GT, UVA, and Pitt (unless Pitt loses all 3)

If Pitt is involved in any of the ties idk how the winner would be determined in a 3 way tie or more. If Pitt losses all 3 and any of these three options happen we win the Costal. Miami winning just would have helped with the tie situation if Pitt lost 2 and finished with the same record, but it wasn’t a make it or brake it thing. This also assumes Duke losses to Clemson but if they somehow pulled it off they would still need to beat WF and UNC.
Click to expand...
A. Two-Team Tie
1. Head-to-head competition between the two tied teams.
2. Win-percentage of the tied teams within the division.
3. Head-to-head competition versus the team within the division with the best overall win-percentage (divisional and non-divisional), and proceeding though the division. Multiple ties within the division will be broken from first to last using the league’s tie-breaker policies.
4. Overall win-percentage versus all common non-divisional opponents.
5. Combined win-percentage versus all non-divisional opponents.
6. Win-percentage versus common non-divisional opponents based upon their order of finish (overall conference win-percentage) and proceeding through other common non-divisional opponents based upon their divisional order of finish.
7. The tied team with the higher ranking by the Team Rating Score metric provided by SportSource Analytics following the conclusion of regular season games.
8. The representative shall be chosen by a draw as administered by the Commissioner or Commissioner’s designee.

B. Three (or More) Team Tie
(Three team (or more) tiebreaker procedure will be used to break all ties to identify the Championship game representative. Once a team is eliminated from the tie, the tie-breaker procedures restart for the remaining teams. If the three (or more) team tie can only be reduced to two teams, the two-team tiebreaker format will then be applied).
1. Combined head-to-head win-percentage among the tied teams.
2. Win-percentage of the tied teams within the division.
3. Head-to-head competition versus the team within the division with the best overall (divisional and non-divisional) Conference win-percentage, and proceeding through the division. Multiple ties within the division will be broken first to last, using the league’s tie-breaker policies.
4. Combined win-percentage versus all common non-divisional opponents.
5. Overall win-percentage versus non-divisional opponents.
6. Win-percentage versus common non-divisional opponents based upon their order of finish (overall conference win-percentage) and proceeding through other common non-divisional opponents based upon their divisional order of finish.
7. The tied team with the highest ranking by the Team Rating Score metric provided by SportSource Analytics following the conclusion of regular season games.
8. The representative shall be chosen by a draw as administered by the Commissioner or Commissioner’s designee.
 
tech_wreck47

tech_wreck47

Helluva Engineer
Messages
8,670
Animal02 said:
A. Two-Team Tie
1. Head-to-head competition between the two tied teams.
2. Win-percentage of the tied teams within the division.
3. Head-to-head competition versus the team within the division with the best overall win-percentage (divisional and non-divisional), and proceeding though the division. Multiple ties within the division will be broken from first to last using the league’s tie-breaker policies.
4. Overall win-percentage versus all common non-divisional opponents.
5. Combined win-percentage versus all non-divisional opponents.
6. Win-percentage versus common non-divisional opponents based upon their order of finish (overall conference win-percentage) and proceeding through other common non-divisional opponents based upon their divisional order of finish.
7. The tied team with the higher ranking by the Team Rating Score metric provided by SportSource Analytics following the conclusion of regular season games.
8. The representative shall be chosen by a draw as administered by the Commissioner or Commissioner’s designee.

B. Three (or More) Team Tie
(Three team (or more) tiebreaker procedure will be used to break all ties to identify the Championship game representative. Once a team is eliminated from the tie, the tie-breaker procedures restart for the remaining teams. If the three (or more) team tie can only be reduced to two teams, the two-team tiebreaker format will then be applied).
1. Combined head-to-head win-percentage among the tied teams.
2. Win-percentage of the tied teams within the division.
3. Head-to-head competition versus the team within the division with the best overall (divisional and non-divisional) Conference win-percentage, and proceeding through the division. Multiple ties within the division will be broken first to last, using the league’s tie-breaker policies.
4. Combined win-percentage versus all common non-divisional opponents.
5. Overall win-percentage versus non-divisional opponents.
6. Win-percentage versus common non-divisional opponents based upon their order of finish (overall conference win-percentage) and proceeding through other common non-divisional opponents based upon their divisional order of finish.
7. The tied team with the highest ranking by the Team Rating Score metric provided by SportSource Analytics following the conclusion of regular season games.
8. The representative shall be chosen by a draw as administered by the Commissioner or Commissioner’s designee.
Click to expand...
I think GT could win it in the case of a 3 or 4 way tie, if number 2 is talking about the costal only when talking about the division. If Pitt lost to VT and Miami that would make them have the worst winning percentage of all the teams with ties because GT, VT, and UVA would all have a loss with cross over teams. I think I’m reading that right? At that point we have the head to head with UVA and VT.
 
AUFC

AUFC

Helluva Engineer
Messages
2,852
Location
Atlanta
I'm having a hard time figuring out how we win in a 3/4 way tie. Combined h2h win percentage among the tied teams is going to eliminate UVA and VT and then we'll lose on h2h to Pitt. Think we need them to lose the next 3 games which looks really unlikely.

Think we need a VT win over Pitt. That puts us in a 3 way tie with a good ol' circle of suck (GT > VT > Pitt > GT etc...) and then we win it on division record I guess? What happens if UVA gets in on this as well?
 
GTNavyNuke

GTNavyNuke

Helluva Engineer
Featured Member
Messages
10,063
Location
Williamsburg Virginia
I'm glad y'all are doing all the figuring on this one. Thanks. Anyone know the ESPN % of each team winning Coastal? Someone said it was 5% for GT after the Friday night game. Should have gone up since we won and other pieces fell into place.

I really think Pitt will be a one or two loss Coastal champ. We can't do anything about that now. But it is deeply satisfying to see us playing good football again.

Supersizethatorder-mutt said:
Miami really looks like crap. As much as I hate them, I really want them to beat Duke. I think I hate Duke more lately
Click to expand...

I was having trouble deciding who to pull against too. But then they kept showing the Revered Richt and it was easy. How far UM has fallen this year.
 

Deleted member 2897

Guest
Thanks to Duke and BC for besting Miami and VPISU. Things are headed in the right direction. Week by week more and more teams will be eliminated from the race due to our head to heads. We MUST keep winning though. If we finish 5-3, we’d be 7-4 going into uGA, which would be a great turnaround from 1-3. Wish we could have the Pitt game back, as we’d be in the drivers seat, but there are no redos.
 
Top