No, that was Chris Webber.LOL, Is that the one of the Fad 5 , that called timeout?
Good memory @jbix80No, that was Chris Webber.
Ironically, when we won the ACCT in 1993, the team we beat (UNC) won that National championship that year. Would be cool if FSU could pull it off.I don't know if Florida State is underseeded but they definitely possess the formula for winning a title. Great guard play, experience, lots of length, fantastic coach. I took them to win their region but a run to the national championship wouldn't surprise me in the slightest.
They did do away with the last 10 metric but they also speak to the eyeball test - partly as a way to give them cover to move teams around - but I was hoping that the eyeball test for our play toward the end of the year would move us to that 7 slot. However, given that they were down seeding pretty much all of the ACC I guess the eyeball test didn't help much at that point.That's all true, but i'm trying to stay close to what the Committee says it does.
as I said at the time we were talking about seeding I though GT deserved a 7 but would probably get an 8/9.
The Committee used to put more weight on late season and Conference Tourney's but they have basically done away with that.
Wonder if the "down" ACC year narrative changes if 'Cuse and FSU both make the Final 4 and an ACC teams wins it all?
Gonzaga looks killer...but FSU has the length and athletes to play with anyone. If 'Cuse shoots lights out like they can, that one day turnover against their zone defense is TOUGH. Anything can happen in a tournament setting.
Hope he made his money playing, Walton sure is irritating as an announcerSome say he was the greatest center to ever play. Battled knee issues his entire career but still dominated when he was in the game.
I'm fine with fsu missing the final 4, hope they lose in the final 8. No final 4 for Hamilton is one less thing FSU can sell to recruits.Ironically, when we won the ACCT in 1993, the team we beat (UNC) won that National championship that year. Would be cool if FSU could pull it off.
But it was a competitive day off the the B10. Move ‘em all up in the rankings for dominating the off day.Hello everyone, and happy Tuesday. Not a single Big Ten team won today yet either.
So, what are the mechanics behind the horrendously large seeding error and mistaken conference power ratings this year?
The Big10 and the Big12 were seeded far too high and the PAC10 was seeded far too low.
Was it simply that pre-season ranking biases were not properly corrected over the course of the season due to a truncated preseason out of conference schedule or are the ratings formulae fundamentally flawed?
The good news (sort of) is that the 'Cuse team playing now is better than the 'Cuse team we beat.Bummer watchin cuse and FSU advance knowin we took those guys down w a healthy Moses, but glad to see acc teams doin work.
Regarding the models, the lack of out of conference games among top teams has led to the few games that were played OOC to have far much weight. Since most of those games are in Nov/Dec, the few data points to link the conferences are those early games. It isn't the fault of the model that it isn't given enough data.So, what are the mechanics behind the horrendously large seeding error and mistaken conference power ratings this year?
The Big10 and the Big12 were seeded far too high and the PAC10 was seeded far too low.
Was it simply that pre-season ranking biases were not properly corrected over the course of the season due to a truncated preseason out of conference schedule or are the ratings formulae fundamentally flawed?