I see no reason why the NCAA can't just request copies of those wiretaps and other evidence. They frequently do investigations that are not criminal in nature. So there shouldn't be any argument about whether or not that wiretap was admissable in court or not - the NCAA doesn't conduct criminal trials, so it doesn't matter.
Second, if you're Charleston Southern, Hofstra, Davidson, UNC Greensboro, St. Mary's, Old Dominion, or Radford, you better wear leather underwear and keep your cheeks puckered tight. The NCAA is coming for you and will make an example of you!
Eggsactly.
When folks won't talk to them, they fall back on the fact that they lack subpoena power and can't compel anyone to speak. Well, now you have a mountain of evidence that would've been comparable to whatever you would've gathered if some random "witness" had spoken to your investigator.
... but now you claim, because it wasn't admitted at that trial, you can't use it?
I'm sure they'll find some legalese to explain why they "can't" but I mean c'mon man. This isn't whizzing on our heads and tellin' us it's raining. This is whizzin' on our heads and just goin', "I'm not whizzin', what're you talkin' about?"