Process question. Hearing oral arguments / testimony is great but I am not sure the NCAA can act on that?
When will documents, wiretaps, and other "stuff" from the trial become public information and publically available for the NCAA to access and use for prosecution/enforcement on their end?
Alright, this is funny, regardless of schools. It's easy to imagine potential jurors taking this and running with it throughout the selection process.
Roughly 50 potential jurors were vetted on Monday, and 18 will ultimately be chosen. Kaplan asked for potential conflicts of interest from the jury pool, a request that brought several humorous moments. One man said he was a season ticket-holder for UConn, and another man then said he was a diehard Syracuse fan.
“Syracuse University,” he said for emphasis, “and notthe University of Connecticut.”
Given the defense that Gatto is using, going to be alot of schools mentioned.
Brian Bowen's dad's testimony could be very interesting. He was given immunity. Will he say Pitino knew?
I don't know how DeSousa is going to be eligible at Kansas. In opening statements it was said he was paid $20K by Adidas to get out of the $20K UA had paid him to go to MD.
The other trial that could be quite interesting is when they get to Merl Code. He was a Adidas when he was arrested, but had been running Nike's AAU program until a year earlier when he left for Adidas.
If this evidence is eventually turned over to the NCAA it is going to be hard for them to do nothing (though that is going to be what they want to do given college basketball is their revenue stream and the schools involved).
FWIW, Zion Williamson's name came up as someone that might be mentioned during the selection of jury members.