I think it is also sorted by overall record.I just copied from theACC.com. It’s the secret Tobacco Road mafia tiebreaker
I think it is also sorted by overall record.
It's mathematically possible. We'd be 6-2, and hold the tiebreaker over UNC. Lville holds it over us, so they'd need to fall to 5-3. Not sure how the tiebreaker would work with VT but they could conceivably drop two more as well.If we win out the remaining conference games, is there still any chance of making the ACCCG?
Please stop…If we win out the remaining conference games, is there still any chance of making the ACCCG?
whoa cowboy!If we win out the remaining conference games, is there still any chance of making the ACCCG?
Please stopIf we win out the remaining conference games, is there still any chance of making the ACCCG?
I have some code to simulate this — it says about 10% chance if we win out based on FPIIf we win out the remaining conference games, is there still any chance of making the ACCCG?
IIRC, first tiebreaker is head to head, so it would depend on the outcome of the VT-UL game. If UL wins that one, then they have H2H over both VT and us, so they go ahead. If VT wins, then I think it goes to record against shared opponents. Not sure how that would check out. There's a lot left to shake out.It's mathematically possible. We'd be 6-2, and hold the tiebreaker over UNC. Lville holds it over us, so they'd need to fall to 5-3. Not sure how the tiebreaker would work with VT but they could conceivably drop two more as well.
What would happen if Lville, VT, and us all end up at 6-2? Do we get weird 3-way tiebreakers?
What would happen if Lville, VT, and us all end up at 6-2? Do we get weird 3-way tiebreakers?
If VT beats UL and the 3 of us end up at 6-2, H2H would be VT 1-0, UL 1-1, GT 0-1, so VT would take the tiebreaker.IIRC, first tiebreaker is head to head, so it would depend on the outcome of the VT-UL game. If UL wins that one, then they have H2H over both VT and us, so they go ahead. If VT wins, then I think it goes to record against shared opponents. Not sure how that would check out. There's a lot left to shake out.
That's now how the tie breaker works. Unless one team beat the other 2, only common opponents between all three teams are considered. If VT's loss is to BC then UL has the tie breaker, otherwise it goes to winning percentage of conference opponents.If VT beats UL and the 3 of us end up at 6-2, H2H would be VT 1-0, UL 1-1, GT 0-1, so VT would take the tiebreaker.
You're right. Just double checked the tiebreaker rules on theacc.com, and they added wording for the head-to-head tiebreaker for 3 teams or more so it only applies if all tied teams played each other. Previously, the tiebreaker was for division champs and since everyone played everyone else within the division there was no need for that wording.That's now how the tie breaker works. Unless one team beat the other 2, only common opponents between all three teams are considered. If VT's loss is to BC then UL has the tie breaker, otherwise it goes to winning percentage of conference opponents.