smokey_wasp
Helluva Engineer
- Messages
- 5,486
How do you explain the D so bad?
Same thing you harped on all offseason and you were right. Lack of big bodies on the DL.
How do you explain the D so bad?
We are. We have to leave the era of FCS football first, which is going to take a year. But, we were SoCon champs a few years ago, I think.
Good thing we never had a losing season under PJ. Or, never had a season with only one FBS win. Then you would really be pissed.
Oh wait....
What is the point of accepting poor coaching? Was is the point of accepting hype with no substance? Fake claims not supported by facts?
I thought we were in the era of "Big boy football"
Not sure what prompted the tweet, but as I recall during the summer, there were high expectations from this board. And I believe from the players. Personally, I expected 6-6.
Now, anyone who questions the teams performance is now a hater. And a "bad" fan.
As a team, they have to stay positive and work to get better. As a player you really have no choice but to focus on getting better and improving every day.
Does that mean as fans we have to be satisfied by the performance this year?
D is D. It’s certainly not rebuild excuse.Same thing you harped on all offseason and you were right. Lack of big bodies on the DL.
Not sure what prompted the tweet, but as I recall during the summer, there were high expectations from this board. And I believe from the players. Personally, I expected 6-6.
Now, anyone who questions the teams performance is now a hater. And a "bad" fan.
As a team, they have to stay positive and work to get better. As a player you really have no choice but to focus on getting better and improving every day.
Does that mean as fans we have to be satisfied by the performance this year?
How do you explain the D so bad?
Yes. Those Citadel players were huge. Way too big and strong for Georgia Tech.Same thing you harped on all offseason and you were right. Lack of big bodies on the DL.
D is D. It’s certainly not rebuild excuse.
I am disappointed we arent further along there. Clayton and Adams would have made a difference. Man, this team has been through a lot.
I get your point, but we never had a season with one FBS win under CPJ.We are. We have to leave the era of FCS football first, which is going to take a year. But, we were SoCon champs a few years ago, I think.
Good thing we never had a losing season under PJ. Or, never had a season with only one FBS win. Then you would really be pissed.
Oh wait....
We had high expectations because we are fans and we want to believe. Same for the players. They have to believe they can win every time they put on the pads. Its the only way to play. But, Virtually everyone who analyzes college football for a living, including former coaches, said we were in for a rough, rough season. Many predicted one or two wins.
I think it is fine to question coaching, decisions, play calls, etc, but to judge the whole thing a failure at this stage, given the full context of what our team is going through? Yeah, bad fandom.
What is the point of accepting poor coaching? Was is the point of accepting hype with no substance? Fake claims not supported by facts?
I thought we were in the era of "Big boy football"
How often were the prognosticators wrong about Tech? But that is not the point of this post.
Still not sure about being a hater or bad fandom.
As a fan, I "hate' it when Tech loses. I hate it when my family sits in blistering noon games and sees Tech lose to a team with less talented players. I hate it when players give their heart, soul and body to win a game and come up short. I hate it when officials blow calls. I hate it when coaches mess up.
I think all of us hate to lose.
I don't think that makes fans haters or bad fans when we discuss Tech football and complain about a 1-5 season so far.