Search results

A 11-1 P5 champion probably gets in with that resume, yes. Clemson would have two+ losses in that scenario (either they missed ACCCG or lost to us twice) and wouldn't get the OSU treatment.

I could not possibly care less about not playing this game. I'm normally the guy who rolls his eyes at the "trap game" crap, but this was a game that made me raise my eyebrows even before the hurricane. We probably would have won (~65%), but it wasn't going to be the walk-over a lot of fans...

Not surprising, considering over 6M people in FL are without power. Obviously local EMA officials told them it wouldn't really be feasible to play it based on local resources or else they would have kept their best home game.

It's a waste of space to have 2 scholly kickers when you only have 85 slots. We signed a guy last year, but he's hurt.

Nice. I was rooting for Adi or UA.

8am according to the countdown. Edit: fixed math

GTAA just sent an email blast about a major announcement tomorrow morning. I assume it's about this.

If it's not anonymous you just get the meaningless twaddle you get at Media Days. From what I've read, most of these quotes come from assistant coaches because they're easier to get a few minutes of time from.

It's dumb rule from the days of B&W TV anyway. Should be lifted and we could have more color-color games.

If the NCAA proposal for a permanent 14-week season (aka 2 bye weeks every year) goes through, this will probably need to be amended. Maybe add a clause that mutual byes don't count or something.

Part of it is that S&P has the ACC getting better. If you look at the game-by-game projection, something like 9 games fall between 33 and 66 percent win chances for GT.

The methodology is a bit odd: http://inside.collegefactual.com/methodologies/best-sports-colleges-ranking-methodology Including APR doesn't make much sense and they factor in athletic success as an equal weight to the academic standings. And we're pulled down in their academic standings (#87...

There's a time and a place for (almost) all beers. PBR is total trash, though.

Ken with some more analysis: http://www.myajc.com/sports/college/what-companies-pay-for-apparel-contract/24fts3hQPYUbcEX8v09waN/ Money quote:

I'm in favor of any 2004-2006 combination if it means we get to use Calvin for one more game...

I think the NLOI binds schools to at least provide the first year of the scholarship (assuming eligible, etc), but I'm not a lawyer and haven't read it in full.

http://www.ramblinwreck.com/genrel/062317aab.html Just started listening, so I don't know if he says anything interesting.

Radcliff has already said that he won't be signing, which isn't a surprise for a 40th-rounder.

Ken from the AJC with some light reporting on this topic today: http://www.myajc.com/sports/college/tech-russell-athletic-partnership-coming-end/8gxmcn7eY7olN2eQlPNIHJ/ Money quote here:

The deal doesn't run out until next summer, so I wouldn't expect an announcement until the Spring.