Search results

Agreed. Putting aside the obvious talent deficiencies, there's no excuse for the clock mgmt mistakes nor the dead-ball unsportsmanlike crap we saw yesterday and that's all on the current HC. Don't get me started on the asinine, proven-stupid QB Switching Scheme. There's nothing that can be...

agreed - let's not make another Sewak mistake and keep incompetence on the staff after it's obvious they stink.

I don't get that. I'd like anyone to point out an example of where this asinine system of QB Switching has worked. I'm not talking a situational Wildcat switch or pulling a Saban and coming out in the 2nd half with a new guy. If we don't know who's our starting QB at this point, that's an...

yeah, VPI was terrible last year so that'll be an easy game for us this year.

The Citadel is 0-2 with losses to Towson St. and Elon. LOSSES to these 2 teams. I agree - under 30 is not a good sign, esp. when Towson St. put up 35 and Elon 28. We should score 40+. Like you said, this is not a particularly good Citadel team, regardless of scheme.

If Elon and Towson St can figure out the Citadel, so will we. Coach Collins gets his first win over the Bulldogs. GT 48 Citadel 10

check your PM. No need to trigger anyone else. :ROFLMAO:

I don't have any 'goals' here. But it's obvious there's a cultish group of people incapable of reading anything that isn't veneration of certain ex-coaches. To those fans I say "Get a grip." I had only 2 people on Ignore. Make it 3.

First and foremost, others need to stop throwing shade onto the current coach and student athletes on our football team. There are a few who do this at every opportunity, with thinly-veiled nastiness in their posts. I will always back the current players over the former coach and would suggest...

I definitely think a package should be there for TO and that he should throw it occasionally.

yeah pretty much. It'd be interesting to let TO throw it every now and then out of that package, which would lessen the predictability factor. I remember this formation being all the rage in the NFL for about half a season before it got mostly abandoned when NFL defenses just started focusing...

you've not had a point this entire time. Seems to be par for whatever course you play though.

THE. TO. IS. GONE. THOUGH. I agree though - talking about the PJ Era should be totally fine, both pros and cons. Not sure why doing so triggers so many GT fans.

The constant defense of the old regime is really strange and cultish. Pointing out that the old scheme had trouble completing...hell, even attempting passes isn't "crapping on 'em". It's just the truth. Pointing out 43 Completions for an Entire Season (2017) isn't "crapping on 'em" - it's...

LOL - the predictable insult. Right on time! "But the offense is suffering!!", says msg-board guy thru a whole 2 games. It's laughably impossible to take your opinion seriously. The old scheme is thankfully, mercifully gone. Let. It. Go.

It makes the most sense to start Graham IMO. Your Clemson argument must be directed at someone else - I don't disagree that TO was a good starter for that particular game. It doesn't make sense to continue using the old system though. Just because CGC inherited linemen used to dive...

Who cares - if it works, it'll be better than anything under the DCs of the PJ regime.

I feel bad for our QBs. They've clearly not had much QB coaching on how to throw before Collins' staff got here.

Let's see - You compare the rate of 2 entire seasons (where we attempted fewer passes than almost every school in the country) vs that of TWO GAMES of a brand-new offense (one of the game vs the defending national champs) with guys who were completely un-coached in throwing the football the past...

again, your counter that the INT rate of the previous few years wasn't that bad was completely wrong. The previous scheme has departed. Please try to support the new coach and players. I know this is against your agenda but the players deserve better.