He won't be ready for drills other than bench press. He's mostly there to get measured and to have team doctors check out his knee to see how well it's coming along.
Lamont Simmons is already here. He sat out this year due to transfer rules. Benson has been here as well. Ratliffe is coming this Spring, as is Branch and LB Emmanuel Bridges. Dunno about Mills.
According to USAToday, they had the highest revenue of any athletic program. I think there are some book-keeping caveats to be noted, but the methodology from syracuse.com isn't well described. The facilities could have fallen under "general athletic expenses" and not been part of the football...
Not sure I understand putting KCH at NT and moving Gamble to UT. Neither is a true NT, but Gamble has played NT all year, and KCH's athleticism seems like a better fit for UT.
Interesting movement on the depth chart.
Will Bryan is the co-starter at RT with Joe
MM is co-starting with Skov
Brant Mitchell is co-starting with Alford at the 3rd LB spot, also backing up Marcordes
MLD and Clinton Lynch starting at AB.
AJ Gray now the back up for nickel and FS
If Notre Dame comes out in the same defense they used against Navy last year, I'd expect there to be some slant routes/something that attacks the soft area in between the corners and the single high safety. They won't be able to cover everything keeping that many LBs and Safeties close to the LOS
Something to watch. The guys who came in after he left did fine, but they have now lost their #1 and #2 guys they had going into the season. One of my biggest fears with them was having them stuff the ball down our throats, and that may not be as easy for them now.
Would also be a great name for the dog if the dog were a stock scammer:
http://www.forbes.com/sites/nathanvardi/2011/12/16/sec-says-rudy-ruettiger-is-a-stock-scammer/
For me it's:
BFDAEGCHI
GT WRs need to be able to make clutch catches even if covered. That's why hands and physicality are my top 2. Leaping ability is also related. Speed helps keep the safeties honest, so that also a big one IMO, but isn't necessarily required for success. Kind of a...
I think crossovers could be removed IF the divisions are re-aligned. See below:
Atlantic
FSU
Miami
Pitt
Cuse
Louisville
Wake
BC
Coastal:
GT
Clemson
NC State
VT
UVA
Duke
UNC
This way you preserve FSU-Miami, GT-Clem, UNC-NCSU while getting rid of crossovers. I personally wouldn't mind not...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.