LOL!No and that’s ridiculous to even say. How many supers has Clemson been to since they fired Leggett? Zero
How many supers has Miami been to since Jim Morris retired? Zero
How many supers has UGA been to since they fired Perno? Zero. And Perno doesn’t hold a candle to Danny Hall
All of those teams are incredibly talented, with rich histories, yet they haven’t equaled or succeeded what their most recent coaches had done. In Miami and Clemson’s cases those coaches were legends akin to DH.
Winning in the postseason in baseball is not easy. Especially not in the format college baseball uses. Have we had enough talent to get to Omaha since 2006? Yeah, definitely. I think we’ve put at least one guy in the big leagues for every 4 year class cycle since DH has been here. But there are teams with future big leaguers on them every year who don’t get out of their own regional. See: Clemson, Miami, UGA, and countless other examples.
In baseball all you can do is get yourself into the postseason. Winning in the postseason equates to nothing more than a stroke of luck and being hot at the right time. Since 1969, only 13 MLB teams with the best regular season record have won the World Series that year. Last year the Phillies had the second-worst record of any team in the playoffs and made the WS. Winning in the playoffs is just dumb luck, and GT hasn’t found any in a long time. It doesn’t help us ton when we tend to get matched up in much tougher regionals than the average P5 team too.
Our last 3 regionals on the road have been: #1 Tennessee 2022, #4 Vandy 2021, #2 Florida 2016
Is there more success to be had for GT baseball than what we’ve seen? Yes. Is Danny Hall to blame for our postseason mishaps? No. That’s just baseball.
You're spot on. Thank you.No and that’s ridiculous to even say. How many supers has Clemson been to since they fired Leggett? Zero
How many supers has Miami been to since Jim Morris retired? Zero
How many supers has UGA been to since they fired Perno? Zero. And Perno doesn’t hold a candle to Danny Hall
All of those teams are incredibly talented, with rich histories, yet they haven’t equaled or succeeded what their most recent coaches had done. In Miami and Clemson’s cases those coaches were legends akin to DH.
Winning in the postseason in baseball is not easy. Especially not in the format college baseball uses. Have we had enough talent to get to Omaha since 2006? Yeah, definitely. I think we’ve put at least one guy in the big leagues for every 4 year class cycle since DH has been here. But there are teams with future big leaguers on them every year who don’t get out of their own regional. See: Clemson, Miami, UGA, and countless other examples.
In baseball all you can do is get yourself into the postseason. Winning in the postseason equates to nothing more than a stroke of luck and being hot at the right time. Since 1969, only 13 MLB teams with the best regular season record have won the World Series that year. Last year the Phillies had the second-worst record of any team in the playoffs and made the WS. Winning in the playoffs is just dumb luck, and GT hasn’t found any in a long time. It doesn’t help us ton when we tend to get matched up in much tougher regionals than the average P5 team too.
Our last 3 regionals on the road have been: #1 Tennessee 2022, #4 Vandy 2021, #2 Florida 2016
Is there more success to be had for GT baseball than what we’ve seen? Yes. Is Danny Hall to blame for our postseason mishaps? No. That’s just baseball.
Oooops. NmLOL!
Wait, did you just use post Jim Morris Miami as an example. The coach has been there three plus seasons and is 61-37 in conference during that time and has never finished lower than 2nd in the Coastal. Great example.
Post Leggett Clemson is another great one. They fired their coach for not making the CWS. Yes, let's use them as an example.
You are comedy gold
You know what is ridiculous? To suggest that 16 years of failure, yes failure, is merely the result of bad luck. That somehow our manager has zero agency or responsibility for the results. That the scores of teams that have won a regional in the past 16 years were just luckier than us. That is ridiculous
Yes, bats slump. Sometimes pitching is ineffective. Tech had multiple GOLDEN opportunities to score runs in the first 2 to 3 innings in the first 2 games and failed. The defense did not help, but was not the sole issue. The issue in the first 2 games was a lack of hitting in critical situations, and poor execution both pitching and defensively. When you're not getting the job done in all 3 phases of the game, you're not likely to win.Guess I will take 1-2 given the alternative entering today. Starting pitching has to get better. Sometimes bats slump, but our pitching never gave us a chance until today.
CDH went to CWS his 1st season. Lolol.Let me add Monte Lee had a better record at Clemson than Danny Hall has had since 2016. Plus he won a conference championship in his first season and still was fired
Yes, he did. I am talking about the past 16 years, not 1994.CDH went to CWS his 1st season. Lolol.
You're also defending (I think) Monte Lee's record. He was a terrible follow on to Jack Leggett. Clemson is still lost.Yes, he did. I am talking about the past 16 years, not 1994.
I am not defending Lee's record. I am comparing it to Hall's record over the same period. Clemson fired Lee despite outperforming Hall over the same period. If we use Clemson as an example, then we should have fired Hall, who is 96-94 in conference since 2016.You're also defending (I think) Monte Lee's record. He was a terrible follow on to Jack Leggett. Clemson is still lost.
If winning % is your only metric?I am not defending Lee's record. I am comparing it to Hall's record over the same period. Clemson fired Lee despite outperforming Hall over the same period. If we use Clemson as an example, then we should have fired Hall, who is 96-94 in conference since 2016.
If we agree that Lee was bad and should have been fired, then why are you surprised that Clemson is still lost in the fist month of a new coach?
For all we know he has done so. The fact that us fans are not aware of his plans does not mean that he has not informed Tech and his coaches what his plans are. CDH does not strike me as the kind of person that gives a damn what the fans think nor does he spend any time on social media (unlike another coach we had in another sport). He is just a good old school kind of coach that cares about his players. He is extremely well respected throughout both college and Major League Baseball for a reason.I really worry about Ramsey bailing to take another HC job - from what I gather, he got a lot of calls in the off-season. CDH needs to go ahead and announce his retirement during or immediately at end of season and Batt hand it over to Ramsey. And hopefully there’s minimal or no buyout on Borrell’s extension - assume Ramsey would bring in his own guys.
Listen. You just don't get it. Everything good that happens is because of Ramsey. Everything else he has nothing to do with.Ramsey has to bear some responsibility for his time on the staff. He is not perfect.
Winning, especially in the CWS, Is my primary metric of the success of a coach and a program. What other metrics should we be using?If winning % is your only metric?
My opinion is Lee can't hold Hall's water no matter how you choose to slice up their records.
Don't make excuses...Busse actually WALKED someone today. I mean he literally WALKED a guy.Can we take a look for a second at the unbelievably dominant performances the three pitchers from today have thrown down this season so far? Combined: 40.1 innings, 50ks, 3 earned runs, 3 extra base hits, 8 BBs, and a 0.67 combined ERA. I don't think it gets any better than that.
If we are going to slam CDB for the poor performances, then we should be just as ready to heap praise for coaching up two players coming off long Tommy Johns recoveries and a Juco transfer. Right?
Well. Coach Hall has an outstanding winning %. If you're only interested in discussing the last half of his tenure. Fair enough.Winning, especially in the CWS, Is my primary metric of the success of a coach and a program. What other metrics should we be using?