Whiskey_Clear
Banned
- Messages
- 10,486
Lol, where are we now? We are adding 4, it would be interesting to see where we actually are with and without the extra 4.
I think 8 but not positive.
Lol, where are we now? We are adding 4, it would be interesting to see where we actually are with and without the extra 4.
Just looked it up and you are correct. Looks like we need to add another 10 atleast lol.I think 8 but not positive.
That shouldn’t be GT’s model getting in an arms race with Bammer, etc. We need to spend enough, but more importantly harness the Institute’s talent to gain competitive advantages. We should be a leader in sports technology & analytics.
Two things:I have heard stuff like this for years....however oddly enough Tech athletics has ALWAYS lagged behind other programs in technology and innovation. Areas where Tech should shine: Ticket distribution, web design, web commerce it is at best pedestrian or at worse embarrassingly uncompetitive.
Two things:
1. They probably don't hire Tech grads in the GTAA to do those things because Tech grads demand higher salaries in the industry, and
Georgia has a room full of undergrad interns that they are paying with gift cards. Where is Tech's cheap labor pool....oh yeah they dont care about football.
2. They probably have one guy over tasked to do what other schools have 5 doing.
See above.
The NCAA and anyone in college athletics knows what goes on because of all the money it brings in more and more people are turning their backs on it and yes I know this goes on from first hand experience . ugag is the worst!
A free market would eventually kill any sport. A sport can’t really exist without reasonable competition. Sadly, that seems to be the direction that college football is heading.Part of me agrees. A cap would help level the playing field ala the salary cap in the NFL. But my free-market side says if you've got the money & football is that important, you should be able to do what you like. Let's be honest, even with a cap, the SEC schools would find a loophole & exploit it.
My concern is, if everybody put this much effort into recruiting, at some point won't these kids will feel bombarded & borderline harassed? Seems like you would push some kids away.
The NFL enacted rules to foster parity and has become the most popular sport in America. CFB needs to follow suit.A free market would eventually kill any sport. A sport can’t really exist without reasonable competition. Sadly, that seems to be the direction that college football is heading.
The NFL enacted rules to foster parity and has become the most popular sport in America. CFB needs to follow suit.
Tech students take paid internships. I got $20+/hr before my senior year in 2008. I imagine the rate for tech interns is higher now.Unpaid interns
I’d be happy to be ahead of Duke, UVA, and UNC in recruiting
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Kirby is winning know with mostly Richt's players. So yeah while this article is about recruiting, you still got to coach em..
That's the major difference I'm seeing from that team. They are well disciplined and a fundamentally sound group. I'd like to know how many new aux staff hires they have that they didn't have in the past.
Georgia Tech is currently ranked #50.
North Carolina is ranked #48.
Virginia is ranked #52.
Duke is ranked #64.
So you must be pretty happy then, despite the fact that you want us to compete with people who offer fake classes and majors in eligibility.
Last time I looked, we were behind them all, and the last few years we have been as well.
Right now, we look a lot better relative to them: https://247sports.com/Season/2018-Football/CompositeTeamRankings?Conference=ACC
NC State and Louisville are killing it right now (and not even looking at Clemson or Miami)
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk