Interesting article on how bringing in a new offense has benefitted the defense. As some have stated before, the flex option DID negatively impact our defense in that it limited what the defense could run because DCs didn't want to focus flex option since the only time they see it is in practice during Spring and Fall camps. BUT, it also hurt from a repetition standpoint because our defense couldn't add to their calls and work on them to gain experience through repetition, and thus limited how much they were able to cover during those camps. Not to give too much away since it's a pay site, but Nate Woody was able to only install FOUR calls coming out of his first spring. (That's coming from David Curry) Contrast that to our current staff that pretty much installed most of the defense during their first spring and got to get lots of players lots of reps. Looking back, I think CNW was a bit limited, and probably why his defense the first year was statistically not that good (even though we did get more negative plays than previous defenses).
https://theathletic.com/966131/2019...effect-of-georgia-techs-offensive-transition/